Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday September 19 2016, @06:56PM   Printer-friendly
from the letting-them-worry-now dept.

The BBC is reporting that two UK YouTube video creators have been charged in relation to online gambling:

Two men have appeared in court charged with offences under the Gambling Act in what is believed to be the first prosecution involving betting on video games.

Craig Douglas and Dylan Rigby, who are both from Essex, are charged with promoting a lottery and advertising unlawful gambling.

Mr Douglas makes gaming videos on YouTube under the pseudonym Nepenthez.

He is also charged with inviting children to gamble.

There is more coverage on engadget

The two allegedly used their online presences to push lotteries and "unlawful gambling" in FIFA 16 matches through bets with in-game coins. Douglas is also accused of encouraging underage gambling by refusing to warn viewers that bets were only for people 18 and over.

Both Engadget and PCGamesN highlight that Douglas (Nepenthez) was aware of the issue, but had not seen this as a problem:

Douglas didn't seem worried about the law back in June 2015, when he replied to a tweet warning him of the dangers of not indicating the site was for people over 18, saying, "Let us worry about that kind of stuff, yeah. Jesus, lmao. Go annoy someone else, somewhere else."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 19 2016, @08:14PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 19 2016, @08:14PM (#403946)

    He might be an idiot, but that doesn't mean that worthless government thugs should come and violate his rights. You're focusing on the wrong things, Mr. Small Government.

  • (Score: 1, Flamebait) by jmorris on Monday September 19 2016, @08:30PM

    by jmorris (4844) on Monday September 19 2016, @08:30PM (#403955)

    My political preferences have nothing to do with this story. Reality is what is left when your attempt to disbelieve it as strongly as you want fail. The State currently holds a monopoly on the use of violence AND a monopoly on gambling. Infringing that monopoly was going to end badly and anyone who couldn't see that is defective and should be culled from the herd. What is right ain't got nothing to do with this sonny.

    • (Score: 2) by Hyperturtle on Monday September 19 2016, @11:35PM

      by Hyperturtle (2824) on Monday September 19 2016, @11:35PM (#404039)

      I agree with you -- people of any political stripe are more likely to gain my respect if they actually make an effort to understand the laws and work within them, if even perhaps to change them. Exploitation of people like what this guy was doing, even if it wasn't physical exploitation and more about peer pressure (all the cool kids are doing it!)... laughing at the laws and claiming ignorance later doesn't really warm me to their plight.

      Only the likes of Uber can get away with breaking the law openly like that, but as to why they mostly manage to get away with it is up for discussion. They clearly are able to provide a more valuable set of user details.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 19 2016, @11:56PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 19 2016, @11:56PM (#404045)

        people of any political stripe are more likely to gain my respect if they actually make an effort to understand the laws and work within them

        There's nothing inherently good, bad, or respectable about following the law; the matter has nothing to do with morality.

  • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Tuesday September 20 2016, @09:14AM

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday September 20 2016, @09:14AM (#404158) Journal

    Er, they broke the law, they go to court. So what is your problem? In this particular case, they were very stupid. They were advised that they were breaking the law (and they could have stopped at this point) but they chose to continue while mocking the legal system. Guess what? They lost that gamble.

    If you don't like the law there are ways of getting laws changed. They might not be easy, but they are still there. If the majority agree with you then eventually the law will be repealed. If you don't like the law, either change the law or change country, but good luck with the latter. They all have laws, and I can guarantee that you will find some of them that you don't like.

    worthless government thugs

    And who were these people? It doesn't say in the article. Doesn't mention the police, inland revenue, court officers - it simply says that they had been brought before the court. So it seems that you believe that anyone connected with the government or the legal system are 'worthless government thugs'? I think that you have a problem with society, and you expect everyone else to change to suit you. It will not happen.