SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
SpaceX's CEO Elon Musk has been talking about the Mars Colonial Transporter (MCT) since around 2012, and has said that SpaceX will not hold an initial public offering until the MCT is flying regularly. The MCT was said to be able to deliver 100 tons of cargo to the surface of Mars, fly using upgraded "Raptor" rocket engines fueled by liquid oxygen (LOX) and liquid methane, and achieve full reusability on all stages.
Now, ahead of a session at the International Astronautical Congress on Sept. 27th, Musk has decided to change the name of the Mars Colonial Transporter to reflect broader and more ambitious planned capabilities:
For most of its 14 year existence, SpaceX has focused on designing and developing the hardware that will lead to its ultimate goal: colonizing Mars. These plans have remained largely secret from the general public, as company founder Elon Musk has dropped only the barest of hints. But that is expected to change on Sept. 27, during a session at the International Astronautical Congress, when Musk details some of these plans for the first time in a public forum.
However, on the eve of the meeting, Musk dropped a surprise on Twitter. The workhorse spacecraft that will carry approximately 100 tons of cargo or 100 people to the surface of Mars, which until now has been popularly known as the Mars Colonial Transporter, can't be called that, Musk said. "Turns out MCT can go well beyond Mars, so will need a new name..." he tweeted on Friday evening. By Saturday evening he had a new name dubbing the spacecraft the "Interplanetary Transport System," or ITS.
Mars, it turns out, isn't the solar system's only marginally habitable world for would-be new world colonists. The Moon, Venus, the asteroid Ceres, and outer Solar System moons Titan and Callisto all have some advantages that could allow for colonies to subsist. However, Mars has generally been the preferred destination—due to its relative proximity to Earth, a thin atmosphere, and sources of water ice. Musk now seems to be suggesting that some of these more distant destinations, especially moons around Jupiter and Saturn, might be reachable with the Interplanetary Transport System.
Also at TechCrunch.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by takyon on Tuesday September 20 2016, @12:45PM
In the long run, if we don't have a base on every one of those objects, then the space experiment has failed.
Bases need to be self-sufficient, capable of manufacturing using materials from the surface, and constructed by robots in advance.
The cost of setting up the base needs to be as cheap as possible. $1-3 billion preferred, including multiple launches to send construction bots and humans. Hopefully full reusability of rockets will make this conceivable. There are also schemes to assemble ships or fuel in orbit.
Landing humans on Phobos could be a cheap alternative to Mars, since robots on Mars could be teleoperated from Phobos, and a lot less fuel is needed to get to Phobos. It probably won't be the first choice for Mars planners just due to the prestige of landing on Mars. And Mars has a decent surface gravity.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]