Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday September 20 2016, @05:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the mama-don't-allow-no-competition-'round-here dept.

TechDirt reports

Wilson, North Carolina's Greenlight [publicly-owned ISP], has had to disconnect one neighboring town or face violating state law. With state leaders tone deaf to the problem of letting incumbent ISPs write such laws, and the FCC flummoxed [by a federal court] in its attempt to help, about 200 home Internet customers in [the town of] Pinetops will thus lose access to gigabit broadband service as of October 28

[...] Greenlight's fiber network provides speeds of 40Mbps to 1Gbps at prices ranging from $40 to $100 a month, service that's unheard of from any of the regional incumbent providers (AT&T, CenturyLink, Time Warner Cable) that lobbied for the protectionist law. Previously, the community of Pinetops only had access to sluggish DSL Service from CenturyLink.

Related:
Muni ISP forced to shut off fiber-to-the-home Internet after court ruling (Ars Technica)

Previous: Appeals Court Rules the FCC Cannot Override State Laws Banning Municipal ISPs


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by JNCF on Wednesday September 21 2016, @01:09AM

    by JNCF (4317) on Wednesday September 21 2016, @01:09AM (#404606) Journal

    I like the *idea* of city states, but they don't work well in a civilization that has rapid transportation and communication.

    I don't see why not. If anything I'd expect those factors to make it easier for non-monolithic entities to interact with each other. Rightly or wrongly, I model the rise of large governments as being a matter of military might.

    A possible idea would be to have multiple levels of government from somewhere below city sized to national, and for each level to only be able to regulate the two or three levels immediately below it.

    To me this sentence and the details that follow it seem to argue for how a government ought to be structured, but not how big the overall structure should be. Are you imagining that the highest level of this fractal government would be a one world government, or are you thinking of dividing existing federal governments into this structure, or perhaps establishing a maximum depth that a tree of governments can reach before splitting entirely?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 21 2016, @05:26AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 21 2016, @05:26AM (#404662)

    Singapore

    Possession of chewing gum is a crime there.
    ...and $DEITY help you if you get caught in possession of a firearm or ammunition--even if that's part of an inert piece of jewelry.
    google.com/search?q=intitle:Singapore+"a.single.bullet.in.your.luggage" [1] [archive.li]

    [1] The S/N comments engine is still NEEDLESSLY stripping %22 out of hyperlinks.

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]