Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday September 22 2016, @01:05PM   Printer-friendly
from the stop-interrupting-me dept.

Tech Review reports an "impossible" development, https://www.technologyreview.com/lists/innovators-under-35/2016/inventor/dinesh-bharadia/

Because the signal from broadcasting a radio transmission can be 100 billion times louder than the receiving one, it was always assumed that outgoing signals would invariably drown out incoming ones. That's why radios typically send and receive on different frequencies or rapidly alternate between transmitting and receiving. "Even textbooks kind of assumed it was impossible," Bharadia says.

Bharadia developed hardware and software that selectively cancel the far louder outgoing transmission so that a radio can decipher the incoming message. The creation of the first full-duplex radio, which eventually could be incorporated into cell phones, should effectively double available wireless bandwidth by simply using it twice.

Any bets on when this will make it to production, maybe as part of 7G(eneration) wireless? Or will the technology go black, used first by military?

And, does a person's name ever influence their career? "Bharadia" sounds awfully close to "bi-radio"...


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 22 2016, @06:34PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 22 2016, @06:34PM (#405221)

    The transmitting part can cleanly remove his own signal and read the other one, but a third party would have to do a lot more work to deduce both the signals. I don't know enough about radio to comment on how much work really, but it seems like it would impede casual eavesdropping while probably not seriously impeding a real adversary.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by Spook brat on Thursday September 22 2016, @07:24PM

    by Spook brat (775) on Thursday September 22 2016, @07:24PM (#405239) Journal

    it seems like it would impede casual eavesdropping while probably not seriously impeding a real adversary.

    Not even that. Anyone listening with an antenna that's not literally on the same circuit as the transmitter doesn't have anywhere near the problem listening to both transmissions as either transmitter does. It's like standing in a cocktail party; unless someone is shouting right in your ear it's not hard to hear multiple conversations at once.

    If you want to make a clean recording of only one voice in multiple broadcasts then that can be tricky, but it's not a problem fixed by this article's innovation (and not particularly hard, either).

    --
    Travel the galaxy! Meet fascinating life forms... And kill them [schlockmercenary.com]