Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Sunday September 25 2016, @10:27AM   Printer-friendly
from the HA-HA! dept.

I always find the various authentication experiences to be more annoying than reassuring, but until now I've always managed to defeat whatever bizarre scheme a web site has created.

Yes, I'm fan of "Reset Password."

Microsoft though has stopped me dead by refusing me access to an outlook.com [account] even though I have the email address and password.

About three years ago someone established an outlook.com email for an organization. They passed the login info on to me. I subsequently just accessed it via Gmail for the next two years.

Today I tried to log in to outlook.com make some changes. They apparently feel that I am not who I say I am and demand some kind of "authentication."

After a half an hour of repeatedly submitting "Verification Forms" (Names, Birthdate, City, Postal Code, Captchas, Previous passwords....," entering numerous PINs, and generally jumping through hoops, I have concluded that I will never ever access this account again.

Best of all the email quoted below offers no way that I can appeal this to some kind of living being.

Is this the worst authentication disaster ever? Is there any logical reason why you would make it impossible for your customers to ever recover an account?

[Continues...]

We recently received a request to recover your Microsoft account *****@outlook.com. Unfortunately, our automated system has determined that the information you provided was not sufficient for us to validate your account ownership. Microsoft takes the security and privacy of our customers very seriously, and our commitment to protecting your personal information requires that we take the utmost care in ensuring that you are the account owner.

Please submit a new account verification form

At this point, your best option is to submit a new form with as much accurate information as you can gather. The more information you can include in the form, the better the chance you'll have of regaining access to your account. We've included a few tips below to help you fill out the form as completely and accurately as possible.

> Submit a new form

Helpful tips for filling out another form:

Answer as many questions as you can.
Use the information you provided when you created the account, or last updated it.
Submit the form from a computer you frequently use.
You will be asked to list recently used email addresses and the subject lines from recent emails. Ask for help from family members, friends, or business contacts to confirm their email addresses and tell you the subject lines of the last three emails they sent you.
Make sure to use the correct domain for your account, such as hotmail.com, live.com, or outlook.com. Keep in mind that your email address may be country specific. For example, if you created your account in Sweden, your domain would be "hotmail.co.se" rather than "hotmail.com".

Ready?

> Submit a new form

Thank you,
Microsoft Support Team

Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052
USA


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Marand on Sunday September 25 2016, @02:46PM

    by Marand (1081) on Sunday September 25 2016, @02:46PM (#406267) Journal

    Who says they're mutually exclusive? Making a separate account for every sign-up ever is unnecessary overkill, so I mix the two ideas.

    I have multiple accounts I use, but I also use the +foo thing along with it so that I don't have to check (and manage) dozens of separate accounts. I can have, say, one email for forum type junk and add +sitename to further separate and identify, then do the same thing for a different account dedicated to communication stuff (IM accounts, stuff like that), and so on.

    You're right that people can strip the +foo but few (if any) actually do, so it provides easy sorting because I can filter on the incoming address instead of the sender address (which I've noticed sometimes changes as the sender changes their infrastructure, or outsources mailing list duty to another company, etc.)

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 25 2016, @03:49PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 25 2016, @03:49PM (#406283)

    Use something like foo99bar@example.com.

    There's lots of software that filters for proper email addresses, and many of them work slightly differently. So if you push the envelope you're asking for trouble.

  • (Score: 2) by Chromium_One on Sunday September 25 2016, @04:52PM

    by Chromium_One (4574) on Sunday September 25 2016, @04:52PM (#406307)

    Why not a new address per account? It's a bit more record keeping for new signups, but not much once you've got a system set up. Any new address is forwarded to (or mail alias is created for) your main address, one filter rule per address to sort to an appropriate folder, done.

    --
    When you live in a sick society, everything you do is wrong.
    • (Score: 2) by Marand on Monday September 26 2016, @04:18AM

      by Marand (1081) on Monday September 26 2016, @04:18AM (#406526) Journal

      Mostly just convenience. If I decide I want to sign up for something I don't have to stop and go set up a mail alias in the middle of it, I just stick a +string on there during sign-up and I'm done. I could get similar behaviour making an address act as a catch-all so that mail to any un-created addresses goes to that one, but I've never liked doing that.

      So, I do +foo most of the time because it's fast/easy, then switch to separate addresses if it fails for some reason.