Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Tuesday September 27 2016, @11:44PM   Printer-friendly
from the sweet-sweet-honeypot dept.

From the register

Brian Weinreich has been trolling spammers for two years using a bot that fires realistic and ridiculous replies to the pervasive online salespeople.

He simply forwards unwanted emails to a specific address and the bot takes over. Offering the spammers open ended questions that they fall over themselves to answer.

My favourite bit from Brian's blog is "after the first month, I didn't have to feed the Looper any more. People were just spamming it on their own.". The spammers were selling on the list of "bitters" to other spammers.

The code is on GitHub

[editor's note: we covered a somewhat similar story here. Does this one have the same ethical implications?]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 28 2016, @03:43AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 28 2016, @03:43AM (#407175)

    What about when the spammers start using bots. Now a spammer bot can get into a long discussion with anti-spammer bots. The problem will just scale both ways.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 28 2016, @09:43AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 28 2016, @09:43AM (#407300)

    If bots were good enough to talk suckers out of their money, spammers would already be using bots.

    Spamming the spammers with fake questions from fake suckers sounds like it would indeed work to harm spammers' fraudulent business.