Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday September 29 2016, @02:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the filling-in-the-dots dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram.

Following a story that we reported a few days ago which covered how the latest software update issued by HP for its printers prevented them from working with other cartridges, HP have responded and promise another update to re-enable other ink cartridges. But HP is still defending its practice of preventing the use of non-HP ink and is making no promises about refraining from future software updates that force customers to use only official ink cartridges.

"We updated a cartridge authentication procedure in select models of HP office inkjet printers to ensure the best consumer experience and protect them from counterfeit and third-party ink cartridges that do not contain an original HP security chip and that infringe on our IP," the company said.

The recent firmware update for HP OfficeJet, OfficeJet Pro, and OfficeJet Pro X printers "included a dynamic security feature that prevented some untested third-party cartridges that use cloned security chips from working, even if they had previously functioned," HP said.

For customers who don't wish to be protected from the ability to buy less expensive ink cartridges, HP said it "will issue an optional firmware update that will remove the dynamic security feature. We expect the update to be ready within two weeks and will provide details here."

Source: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/09/hp-to-issue-optional-firmware-update-allowing-3rd-party-ink/

While I'm sure that we recognise that HP cannot guarantee the operation of any printer not using their own cartridges, how often are similar techniques used to lock-out fair competition? What are your experiences and views?.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by SomeGuy on Thursday September 29 2016, @03:41PM

    by SomeGuy (5632) on Thursday September 29 2016, @03:41PM (#407963)

    From TFS:

    "cartridges that do not contain an original HP security chip..."

    Security? So that is what they are calling it these days?

    Finally, back to that cat box: don't buy one. Too many reviewers complained that it has a nasty habit of not effectively cleaning turds out, and then when it does the heated drying cycle, ends up cooking the fresh cat shit, which you can probably imagine is just about the worst stench you could even be subjected to in your life.

    But don't you want protection from those evil third party (turd party?) cleaner cartridges? Or those sick evil pedo fake printer ink cartridges?

    It is for your own protection!! You can't be too safe! Think of the children! If you don't, the terrorists win!

    I recently saw a toilet at Lowe's that had some kind of proprietary cleaning cartridge in it too; I wonder if that had a chip.

    Yea, but how else can you automate posting to Twitter? :P

    It's copy protection all over again: "Don't copy that poopy!"

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2