Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday September 29 2016, @07:35PM   Printer-friendly
from the worth-a-try dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Researchers led by NASA's former chief technologist are hoping to launch a satellite carrying water as the source of its fuel. The team from Cornell University, guided by Mason Peck, want their device to become the first shoebox-sized "CubeSat" to orbit the moon, while demonstrating the potential of water as a source of spacecraft fuel. It's a safe, stable substance that's relatively common even in space, but could also find greater use here on Earth as we search for alternatives to fossil fuels.

Water is a way around this issue because it is essentially an energy carrier rather than a fuel. The Cornell team isn't planning to use water itself as a propellant but to rather use electricity from solar panels to split the water into hydrogen and oxygen and use them as the fuel. The two gasses, when recombined and ignited will burn or explode, giving out the energy that they took in during the splitting process. This combustion of gasses can be used to drive the satellite forward, gaining speed or altering its position in orbit of whichever desired planet or moon is the target.

Solar panels, with high reliability and no moving parts, are ideally suited to operate in zero gravity and in the extreme environments of space, producing current from sunlight and allowing the satellite to actively engage on its mission. Traditionally this energy is stored in batteries. But the Cornell scientists want to use it to create their fuel source by splitting the on-board water.

Source: http://phys.org/news/2016-09-space-rocket-fuel-power-revolution.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Thursday September 29 2016, @11:13PM

    by Immerman (3985) on Thursday September 29 2016, @11:13PM (#408161)

    Have we worked out any way to pipe H2 long distances without massive losses though? Even at atmospheric pressure, you're still dealing with roughly zero partial pressure on the outside of the pipe wall, so you need a wall that H2 can't flow through.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by RS3 on Friday September 30 2016, @12:39AM

    by RS3 (6367) on Friday September 30 2016, @12:39AM (#408184)

    I don't know about these things of which you speak. You're saying H2 can leech through things? Such that over long distances, the huge surface area of the pipe would be a sieve? Could we coat it with PTFE or something similar? How about a small gauge rail system with canisters?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 30 2016, @01:33AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 30 2016, @01:33AM (#408196)

      Send the hydrogen-filled canisters through the Hyperloop.

    • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Friday September 30 2016, @05:37PM

      by Immerman (3985) on Friday September 30 2016, @05:37PM (#408455)

      In case that wasn't humor...

      Yes H2 is pretty much the smallest stable particle in the universe - a tiny "barbell" about as long as a Helium atom is wide, and considerably narrower, capable of slipping right through most molecular lattices. One of the major obstacles to hydrogen usage is that H2 will rapidly leak right through the walls of pretty much any container you put it in. I looked for info suggesting that PTFE could be used for containment, but from what I found it sounds like it's only good by the generally low standards of polymers. And strings of canisters only make it worse by increasing the surface area for a given volume of hydrogen.

      That's not to say that it couldn't be done, but it's worth asking whether it would actually be significantly more efficient than standard power lines, especially after the higher construction and maintenance costs are factored in (in energy as well as money).

      And of course there's also another alternative for transporting electricity long distances - superconducting power lines. As I recall there's long been a project in the works to build such a line between Europe and the vast solar potential of the Sahara, stalled in large part due to the political instability in Africa rather than any technical or economic objections.