Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday September 30 2016, @03:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the first-of-its-kind-lawsuit dept.

The Conservation Law Foundation is taking Exxon to court over water pollution in Massachusetts.

[In the Autumn of 2015], exposés by InsideClimate News [1] and the Los Angeles Times confirmed that oil giant ExxonMobil knew as early as the late 1970s that climate change caused by human activities would be devastating if left unchecked. But instead of taking action, the corporation lied to the government, and to all of us, by funding an aggressive campaign trying to foment doubt about climate science.

So, we started our own investigation, focused on how this climate deceit has affected us closer to home. We found that despite knowing the harm [that] climate change could cause, ExxonMobil left its oil storage facility in Everett, MA on the Mystic [River] vulnerable to flooding from storms and rising seas. Now it's just a matter of time before a giant storm floods our streets with a toxic soup from Exxon's dilapidated facilities.

In an effort to finally hold ExxonMobil accountable for its climate deceit, gross negligence, and violations of federal pollution regulations, CLF today [September 29] officially filed suit[PDF] against the corporate giant. It's a landmark suit, and not only because it's the first major lawsuit to be filed against the company since the #ExxonKnew revelations were uncovered.

[...] This case presents a tremendous opportunity for change, and the potential to set a precedent for the dynamic role of local advocacy in taking on transnational corporations. It also shows us that no company, organization, or government agency is too big to be held responsible for its actions, and no one town or resident is too small or too weak to demand environmental justice.

[...] Learn more about the lawsuit here.

[1] Data Transfer Interrupted Google cache


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by bzipitidoo on Friday September 30 2016, @04:59PM

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Friday September 30 2016, @04:59PM (#408440) Journal

    Big Oil's greed and callousness may ultimately be far more damaging than anything any other industry has ever done, and they've pulled plenty of whoppers. Next to most of the planet's major coastal cities drowned, millions of people forced to relocate and going hungry when crops fail thanks to climate change, resulting in war, possibly even nuclear war and the destruction of our civilization, things like Union Carbide killing 4000 in Bhopal, India, fishing and tourism industries ruined and health of thousands harmed by oil spills such as the Exxon Valdez and British Petroleum's Deepwater Horizon, TEPCO's Fukushima power plant forcing the evacuation of contaminated land for decades and perhaps centuries, and Big Tobacco continuing to peddle their customer sickening and killing products, seem relatively minor.

    These corporate organizations want to cling to the notion that they are actually small fish in a very big world, and their actions have no lasting effect. They don't want to be responsible. They've gotten away with that attitude for years. Why should they change? So it's up to us to do something about this. And that something may have to be profound. Making them pay for their messes won't change their basic nature. This lawsuit can only be a start. Like, make it so corporations aren't plutocracies. Change how markets work. Stop idolizing money. Not everything of value gets measured. money can't be a universal ruler.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Friday September 30 2016, @06:14PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday September 30 2016, @06:14PM (#408478) Journal

    Good title. I don't entirely agree with the body of your post, but damned good title.

    To stop anti-social corporate behaiour, we only need remember one thing. No corporation has a right to even EXIST unless it is approved of by WE THE PEOPLE. A corporation is supposed to have a charter, a mission, a mission statement. The de facto mission of corporations today is "to make money hand over fist, at any cost".

    That is sufficient reason to revoke licenses. All corporations are incorporated under the laws of one state, or another. The states can easily crack down on the anti-social behaviour. But, "we the people" have forgotten that. Basically, we worship money, and praise any entity which manages to control huge quantities of money. Apple, or any of the other huge companies, which manipulate tax laws to their own advantage. Europe is taking a stab at getting them under control. If the US, Russia, and China all cooperated, all that tax dodging could be stopped, once and for all.

    But, Exxon's anti-social conduct is a helluva lot worse than mere tax dodging.

    Again, the major nations need to cooperate to put a stop to it. Europe probably leads in the quest for renewable energy sources. The US? It's like we just don't give a damn. China? They're only beginning to feel the effects of, and acknowledge that, pollution is bad. Russia? As near as I can tell, they aren't even involved in the discussion.

    Anyway - we can just shut them down, any time. If/when our elected representatives grow some gonads, they can take on the corporate world, and force them to do, or not do, anything at all.

    Exxon won't cooperate with green laws? Revoke their business license, in each and every jurisdiction in which they hold a license. One or two hits like that, and their stock will plummet. Basically, they wise up real quick, or they die a painful corporate death.

    • (Score: 2) by art guerrilla on Friday September 30 2016, @07:52PM

      by art guerrilla (3082) on Friday September 30 2016, @07:52PM (#408520)

      when you are right, you are right...
      korporations are in the saddle, and the devil take the hindmost...
      (guess what, 99% of us are the hindmost...)

    • (Score: 2) by EQ on Friday September 30 2016, @09:48PM

      by EQ (1716) on Friday September 30 2016, @09:48PM (#408542)

      "No corporation has a right to even EXIST unless it is approved of by WE THE PEOPLE. " For the USA - where is that in the Constitution? Stop making stuff up.

      • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Friday September 30 2016, @11:48PM

        by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Friday September 30 2016, @11:48PM (#408589) Journal

        Where in the constitution does it give the government the right to create corporations?

        IIUC at the time the US Constitution was written, that right was reserved to the states, and the feds had no such power. There hasn't been an amendment specifically authorizing such an action, so the Feds have no legal right to charter, recognize, or approve the existence of corporations. They have, indeed, grabbed the right. A search of the text doesn't show the word corporation appearing in either the text of the constitution or any of the amendments.

        So much for legalistics. The GP post did not refer to the law when he said that corporations had no right to exist without public approval, he stated an opinion. His opinion seems to be in accordance with the text of the constitution to which you referred, as if it were a mistake on his part. So come up with another reason.

        --
        Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.