Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday October 02 2016, @09:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the we-need-more-hermaphrodites dept.

Twitch boss Matthew DiPietro is clear that the industry needs to do more about online sexism in gaming.

The senior executive was speaking to us from the streaming site's headquarters in San Francisco.

Gamers have told Newsbeat about their experiences and Twitch says it's doing all it can to stamp out sexism on the platform.

But Matthew tells us this isn't a problem that Twitch can solve on its own.

He says the industry needs to invest money to "move forward on this issue".

He's calling for "investment in terms of people, education and money.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by kurenai.tsubasa on Sunday October 02 2016, @11:37PM

    by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Sunday October 02 2016, @11:37PM (#409181) Journal

    It's the sad truth. If they wanted to make an investment or whatever, they could throw some money my way and invite me into the “counts as a womyn-born-womyn” club right beside that Brianna Wu bitch. 'Course statistically speaking, it's a drop in the bucket. I'm right here! I'm one surgery away from what the SJWs were looking for! But that's not good enough.

    But nope, off to my same old shit job tomorrow dressing up as a boy because I need some kind of income. It's the principle of it that digs at me. Feminists want to castrate guys right up until it turns out that the guy would rather be a girl. Then it's GTFO you bathroom rapist! And double fuck you if you don't find those airheaded bimbos attractive. And whatever. The alt-right and MRAs agree with them so fuck it all.

    It's impossible. They want something impossible to precipitate out of the æther. What else is left but to meet it with cold, indifferent bitterness?

    Conclusion confirmed: womyn-born-womyn are inferior beings. They're baby machines, and they themselves don't care to be anything else.

    Going one's own way….

  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Arik on Monday October 03 2016, @12:22AM

    by Arik (4543) on Monday October 03 2016, @12:22AM (#409193) Journal
    You're assuming the point of this is actually to increase tolerance. It's not. No one makes money by increasing tolerance. They only increase their funding if they can argue 'not enough is being done.' Doing enough would kill the goose, that would be very silly, don't you see my dear boy/girl?

    This isn't about helping the downtrodden. It's about terrorizing us. It's about making sure that we know better than to challenge the status quo - that will cost us our jobs, our livelihoods, our ability to feed our families.
    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
  • (Score: 2) by cubancigar11 on Monday October 03 2016, @11:35AM

    by cubancigar11 (330) on Monday October 03 2016, @11:35AM (#409352) Homepage Journal

    Thanks for not confusing alt-right with MRA. Now I will tell you that there are two genders: those who can give birth and those who can't. Can you give birth? Then stay in the harem and king will protect and provide for you. And if not, then you get to shove bricks, dig holes, cut lumber or get into the army. And transgenders are not supposed to be physically stronger than men so they get the shortest end of the stick. That's it! Every difference between those can't give birth is BS to ensure they keep fighting among themselves - from religion to hair style. And gender is somewhere there too.

    For all the things you say against feminists, the "rainbow" of genders is purely their creation. That's why The King loves feminism in the first place! It is about bringing equality between all women and the king.

    You can blame MRA for not talking about transgenders, but MRA is the source of first deconstruction of gender politics and it is very nascent and consists of a large number of people who don't actually think but are just angry because they have realized that all this time when they were fighting for the king, the king was having fun in the harem.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 03 2016, @02:52PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 03 2016, @02:52PM (#409449)

      Now I will tell you that there are two genders: those who can give birth and those who can't.

      I think you mean "sex".
      The definitions of "sex" and "gender" do differ. A person's "sex" generally refers to their biological make-up. A person's "gender" generally refers to their psychological make-up. Check a dictionary if you don't believe me.

      Particularly note that the term for identifying whether an animal is a boy-animal or a girl-animal, is called "sexing", not "gendering".

      • (Score: 2) by cubancigar11 on Monday October 03 2016, @04:46PM

        by cubancigar11 (330) on Monday October 03 2016, @04:46PM (#409506) Homepage Journal

        I know what's in the dictionary and I know who is writing it [mashable.com]. Do we talk about gender discrimination or sex discrimination? I meant exactly what I said, which is gender discrimination.