Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday October 04 2016, @07:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the what-could-possibly-go-wrong? dept.

International road safety experts are calling for all vehicles to be fitted with speed warning devices, and drivers who exceed the speed limit may find their accelerators disabled by devices that are being considered in Australia.

According to the experts "Driving too fast causes 1.25 million road traffic deaths a year globally, and is a major contributor to the 6.9 per cent increase in deaths on Australian roads to 1275 in the year ending August 31."

The road safety experts called for all European vehicles to be fitted with Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA) devices. These use speed sign recognition and satellite information to warn drivers with sounds or message if they exceed the limit.

The council launched a campaign on YouTube to build support for ISA, saying it had a huge potential to save lives.

Some devices, which have already been integrated into some new models of Ford cars, have an override function that can stop speeding drivers from using the accelerator until they return to the speed limit.

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/function-to-stop-speedsters-from-using-accelerator-the-way-to-cut-road-deaths-20160929-grrqox.html

Anyone want this fitted to their car? I can see problems...


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by TheRaven on Tuesday October 04 2016, @08:31AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Tuesday October 04 2016, @08:31AM (#409871) Journal

    Driving too fast isn't the problem

    Driving too fast may not be the cause of the accident, but it's the cause of the damage that the accident causes. The difference in injuries between a 30mph collision with a pedestrian and a 35 mph collision are huge. Remember, e = mv^2 - you don't need to change v much to transmit a lot more energy to the thing that you hit.

    People are going to die, and losing only 1300 a year in a large country like Australia shouldn't be the cause for these safety fascists to cause more misery to freedom loving people.

    Enforcing the law is fascist now? Currently, speed limits are one of the most selectively enforced laws and a system where most people commit crimes but only certain ones are punished is a lot closer to fascism than one where everyone is punished for violations. If everyone is forced to obey speed limits, then it's a lot more likely that they'll actually fix the ones that are too low.

    The war on masculinity continues.

    I think you're confusing masculinity with the faux masculinity of people who feel the need to overcompensate for something. If you need to drive fast to feel like a man, then that says a lot about you.

    --
    sudo mod me up
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 4, Touché) by maxwell demon on Tuesday October 04 2016, @08:48AM

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Tuesday October 04 2016, @08:48AM (#409880) Journal

    Remember, e = mv^2

    Better remember E=mv²/2. Especially if you ever have to take a physics exam. ;-)

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 04 2016, @12:01PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 04 2016, @12:01PM (#409947)

      In my car, E = m gamma

      • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Tuesday October 04 2016, @01:29PM

        by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 04 2016, @01:29PM (#409972) Journal

        1 / n = sin x

        Now cancel the 'n' on both sides:

        1 = six

        or:

        1 = 6

        --
        When trying to solve a problem don't ask who suffers from the problem, ask who profits from the problem.
        • (Score: 4, Funny) by FatPhil on Tuesday October 04 2016, @02:27PM

          by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Tuesday October 04 2016, @02:27PM (#410002) Homepage
          This looks fun - can I have a go?

          sin / cos = tan
          in / co = tan
          i / co = ta
          i = taco
          --
          Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by MostCynical on Tuesday October 04 2016, @09:10AM

    by MostCynical (2589) on Tuesday October 04 2016, @09:10AM (#409891) Journal

    it varies by state. Victoria has a 0km/h threshold (ie, fixed and mobile speed cameras, police with radar guns and red light safety cameras all book you if you are even 0.5km/h over the limit - even though the Australia Road Rules allow your speedometer to be up to 10% out - these days, the 10% had better be over reading...)

    We already have 'speed limiters', which are supposed to stop trucks going over 100km/h... but seem to fail, alot.
    http://www.armstronglegal.com.au/traffic-law/heavy-vehicle/speed-limiters [armstronglegal.com.au]

    --
    "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by quintessence on Tuesday October 04 2016, @09:20AM

    by quintessence (6227) on Tuesday October 04 2016, @09:20AM (#409896)

    speed limits are one of the most selectively enforced laws and a system where most people commit crimes but only certain ones are punished is a lot closer to fascism than one where everyone is punished for violations.

    Because the law itself is "vague". Driving the speed limit during rush hour? You're impeding the flow of traffic. Planting yourself in the left hand lane without passing? In my state, improper lane usage.

    Anyone with a modicum of sensibility realizes traffic laws (edit: most laws) are contextual (such as exceeding the speed limit to allow for passage of an emergency vehicle, not driving the minimum speed limit when condition are bad, etc.), but you always have law and order types who insist on following the letter of the law without understanding the why (usually safety or ticket revenue) of the law.

    Not to mention there is no reason to just stop there when we can have perfect enforcement of all laws with just some minor modifications to your civil rights (embedded detectors for any illegal substances, 24/7 CCTV everywhere, etc).

    This was brought up during the 70s. It was a stupid idea then, and it's a stupid idea now, but I guess every generation needs the opportunity to rediscover the depths of their stupidity.

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by GungnirSniper on Tuesday October 04 2016, @09:34AM

    by GungnirSniper (1671) on Tuesday October 04 2016, @09:34AM (#409899) Journal

    It's an anti-male movement because males get more speeding tickets, or get in school fights, or whatever we're having zero-tolerance for today.

    • (Score: 3, Touché) by TheRaven on Tuesday October 04 2016, @10:21AM

      by TheRaven (270) on Tuesday October 04 2016, @10:21AM (#409912) Journal
      So, something that would eliminate the need to give anyone speed tickets (because no one would be able to exceed the speed limit) is anti-male because it would disproportionately reduce the number of males receiving tickets?
      --
      sudo mod me up
      • (Score: 0, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 04 2016, @11:17AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 04 2016, @11:17AM (#409931)

        Female detected.

  • (Score: 2) by Hawkwind on Tuesday October 04 2016, @05:18PM

    by Hawkwind (3531) on Tuesday October 04 2016, @05:18PM (#410103)

    Enforcing the law is fascist now?

    Possibly, always. CONSTANT VIGILANCE