SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Johnson & Johnson has issued a security warning about one of its products:
Johnson & Johnson on Tuesday issued a warning about a possible cybersecurity issue with its Animas OneTouch Ping Insulin Infusion Pump. The problem was first reported by Reuters.
Computer security firm Rapid 7 discovered that it might be possible to take control of the pump via its an unencrypted radio frequency communication system that allows it to send commands and information via a wireless remote control. The company alerted Johnson & Johnson, which issued the warning. Getting too high or too low a dose of insulin could severely sicken or even kill. There have been no instances of the pumps being hacked, Johnson & Johnson said.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Johnson & Johnson Issues Security Warning About Insulin Pump
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 28 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
To avoid criticism, do nothing, say nothing, be nothing.
-- Elbert Hubbard
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday October 05 2016, @05:39PM
Let me think about this for just a moment . . . .
They are sticking some foreign object into your body already, right? Just how difficult would it be to put a jack into your body, with which to connect to the device? I mean - there you have the body, insert part A, and part B on a trailing tail. Need it be USB? How about at least micro-USB? I'm not into medicine, really, but where does that first implant go? Somewhere in the trunk of the body, I suppose. Wonder how irritating a micro-USB would be sitting in your navel?
What I think is, not enough crazy people are thinking outside the box here. You certainly don't want everything you rely on to be connected wirelessly to the great IOT. That's just insane.
(Score: 2) by HiThere on Wednesday October 05 2016, @06:58PM
The traditional answer was a device that requires a magnetic (I think) induction loop to be placed ON the body and held in position while adjusting the device. This is certainly the approach used by my wife's pacemaker. No USB port but also no distance adjustment. Even for an external device this would have it's points, as it would avoid jostling what must be a sensitive connection. (I've had USB ports that required considerable force to use.)
But wireless?!? That's just insane. And unencrypted wireless? They must WANT the devices to be compromised.
Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.