Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Wednesday October 05 2016, @10:45PM   Printer-friendly
from the no-privacy-concerns-here dept.

MasterCard's "selfie pay" will be coming to Europe next year after trials in the US, Canada and the Netherlands.

The financial services firm is rolling out biometric technologies that will allow European consumers to authenticate their identity without a password, but with a selfie, in order to provide customers with a more convenient method to sign in and a faster checkout process. Security firms view the development as another sign of the mainstream availability of biometric authentication, comparing it to the introduction of TouchID fingerprint authentication technology in the iPhone.

Javvad Malik, security advocate at enterprise security tools firm AlienVault, said that "selfie pay" is seemingly an attempt to bridge the gap between a fully authenticated method, such as chip and PIN – and unauthenticated payments methods such as contactless.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by DECbot on Wednesday October 05 2016, @10:53PM

    by DECbot (832) on Wednesday October 05 2016, @10:53PM (#410865) Journal

    Remind me again how your phone recognizes the difference between taking a picture of you and taking a picture of a picture of you.

    --
    cats~$ sudo chown -R us /home/base
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by broggyr on Wednesday October 05 2016, @11:09PM

    by broggyr (3589) <broggyrNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Wednesday October 05 2016, @11:09PM (#410870)

    I had a tablet that would unlock via facial recognition. It would ask you to blink to be sure it wasn't a photo.

    --
    Taking things out of context since 1972.
    • (Score: 3, Touché) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Wednesday October 05 2016, @11:15PM

      by Scruffy Beard 2 (6030) on Wednesday October 05 2016, @11:15PM (#410872)

      ... Because moving picture technology has not been invented yet...

    • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 05 2016, @11:34PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 05 2016, @11:34PM (#410874)

      Ever seen those paper books with moving parts or animations made with paper objects? I sure would like to test one against that recognition.

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by krishnoid on Thursday October 06 2016, @02:47AM

      by krishnoid (1156) on Thursday October 06 2016, @02:47AM (#410928)

      Pfft, this is the future we're talking about! Now it'll ask you to duckface.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 06 2016, @12:20AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 06 2016, @12:20AM (#410885)

    Forget about the middle steps. How does MasterCard prevent me from pointing my camera at you and logging into your account? While you're blinking at your camera you're also blinking at my camera. I guess you'd get a notification of a new sign-in from a new device, but that's after the fact.

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Francis on Thursday October 06 2016, @12:53AM

      by Francis (5544) on Thursday October 06 2016, @12:53AM (#410893)

      The relevant question here ought to be whether or not this is more secure than the current system. Nobody has invented a method of verification that is completely impossible to crack, it's just that some are easier than others. Showing up in person is generally quite reliable, except in cases where you've got an identical twin or they can find somebody that looks and sounds like you that they can train to act and think like you as well.

      Obviously, that's incredibly unlikely, but it's technically possible. I'm sure there's even folks that share fingerprints, especially given that fingerprint scanners usually don't attempt to match absolutely every aspect of the fingerprint in the first place.

      OTOH, selfies are a particularly bad idea as you've got to store that biometric data somewhere and it has to be accurate enough to just let the right person in, but inaccurate enough that if you've got more stubble than usual you can still get in.

    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday October 06 2016, @01:02AM

      by bob_super (1357) on Thursday October 06 2016, @01:02AM (#410896)

      This completely fools me because my usual $5 wrench technique leaves people only able to blink with the remaining eye...

      • (Score: 3, Funny) by Bogsnoticus on Thursday October 06 2016, @02:58AM

        by Bogsnoticus (3982) on Thursday October 06 2016, @02:58AM (#410935)

        Thats why you go to the backup plan of introducing their fingernails to a pair of pliers.
        Or knuckles to a ball-peen hammer.
        Or testicles to a couple of bricks.

        No, I'm not a member of any 4 letter security service. Just someone who has worked out ways to stop users fucking with my printers.

        --
        Genius by birth. Evil by choice.
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 06 2016, @04:49AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 06 2016, @04:49AM (#410967)

          Yeah. You sound experienced.
          Which 3 letter agency do you work for?

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 06 2016, @06:21AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 06 2016, @06:21AM (#410988)

            Sounds to me like he works for FUN.

            • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Thursday October 06 2016, @07:28AM

              by maxwell demon (1608) on Thursday October 06 2016, @07:28AM (#411005) Journal

              Sounds to me like he works for FUN.

              Fucking Unshowered Nerds?

              --
              The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
          • (Score: 2) by Bogsnoticus on Thursday October 06 2016, @06:41AM

            by Bogsnoticus (3982) on Thursday October 06 2016, @06:41AM (#410993)

            I'm not employed by any 3, or 4 letter agency to do any of these things.
            I volunteer.

            Damn, now I've said too much. Kindly put on this canvas jacket, yes the one that allows you to hug yourself, while I set up the DVR to endlessly stream all things Kardashian for your viewing pleasure.

            --
            Genius by birth. Evil by choice.
            • (Score: 2) by DECbot on Thursday October 06 2016, @01:44PM

              by DECbot (832) on Thursday October 06 2016, @01:44PM (#411083) Journal

              My Austrian and German colleagues call it the no smoking jacket.

              --
              cats~$ sudo chown -R us /home/base
        • (Score: 3, Funny) by driverless on Thursday October 06 2016, @08:16AM

          by driverless (4770) on Thursday October 06 2016, @08:16AM (#411014)

          Thats why you go to the backup plan of introducing their fingernails to a pair of pliers.

          Or a coupla hard pipe-hittin' niggas and a blowtorch, and let them get medieval on his ass.

  • (Score: 2) by r1348 on Thursday October 06 2016, @06:09AM

    by r1348 (5988) on Thursday October 06 2016, @06:09AM (#410982)

    This will give new meaning to "mugged and shot".