Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday October 07 2016, @03:39AM   Printer-friendly
from the strikes-that-work dept.

Poland is a very Catholic country and the Roman Catholic Church is very much against abortion. The government is also very anti-labor union.

The Committee for a Workers' International (socialistworld.net) reports

[Poland already] has one of the most restrictive anti-abortion laws in Europe, allowing abortion only in the case of rape, a threat to the health or life of the woman, or deformation of the foetus. In practice, even when these conditions are fulfilled abortion is often prevented by doctors who exploit the so-called "conscience clause" and impose their own religious beliefs on patients by refusing vital treatment.

This law was forced through at the beginning of the 1990s [...] (over 70% of the population was against an abortion ban and supported [...] abortion on demand).

[...] [Recent] plans to impose a total ban on abortion have sparked a massive uncontrolled explosion of anger in Poland. On Monday 3 October a strike of Polish women was called, inspired by the example of Icelandic women, who held a nationwide strike in 1975. [...] Even the police's conservative estimates talk about 98,000 people demonstrating in over 143 separate protests across the country. These are easily the biggest ever protests in defence of abortion rights in Poland, far exceeding the protests in 1993, when the current ban on abortion was introduced.

[This week's strike]

[Continues...]

[...] [In response to the proposed ban, and] inspired by the 1976 strike of women in Iceland, the idea was raised of organising a strike of women. This was not called by any of the trade unions, instead the idea came from within the movement by women who had no previous trade union or strike experience. However, due to the anti-trade union laws and the difficulty of organising a legal strike even by a trade union, women were not encouraged to actually strike, but rather to take a day off work on what was nicknamed Czarny poniedzialek (Back Monday).

Unfortunately many women were prevented from taking part in this strike because they [have lousy employment] contracts and have no right to a day off on demand. For example, Lidl supermarket chain threatened to sack staff who took a day off on Monday.

Finally, on the day of the strike, OPZZ, one of the three major trade union federations, expressed its support and pledged to defend its members from victimisation, should they decide to participate in the protest. Thanks to this, many public administration workers, particularly in local government, were able to strike. A number of theatres and small businesses announced they would close that day to allow their staff to participate. Many more women who had no option but to work dressed in black to express their support for the strike.

[...] Around 10,000 gathered outside parliament in the rain. There were no speakers, but the mood was loud and angry. There were rumours that several thousand protesters marched to Teatr Polski, the theatre where Jaroslaw Kaczynski, leader of the ruling party Law and Justice, was having a meeting.

[...] Law and Justice has been taken completely off guard by the movement. It did not plan to introduce a change in the abortion law, at least not this year, but was forced into taking a position by more right-wing elements and the church, who organised their own "citizen's [initiative]".

Due to the scale of the movement, Law and Justice has reacted by announcing that it will prepare its own compromise draft law, which will probably allow abortion in the case of rape and a threat to the life of the woman, but not in the case of a deformity of the foetus. This, of course, is not a compromise at all, but represents a further tightening of the ban and is completely unacceptable. However, it shows that the government is beginning to feel the pressure.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by physicsmajor on Saturday October 08 2016, @01:32AM

    by physicsmajor (1471) on Saturday October 08 2016, @01:32AM (#411662)

    Roe vs. Wade is literally the best decision possible on the topic - in a completely dispassionate analysis. I will not accept your language 'living child' for any fetus with less than a 50% chance to survive if emergently delivered. Nor will I accept that such a thing has any hold against or over the willing mother currently supporting it.

    The father did his part in creating it. From there to delivery the decision to carry the fetus is 100% up to the mother. If you seriously think differently, you're advocating for law where males dictate what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. From your response I assume you are male; would you accept such limitations? If not, think twice before advancing that line again. It's not worthy of further discussion, so I'm moving on.

    I honestly couldn't follow what you were trying to say in the second paragraph. It's clear you don't understand the process of abortion nor fetal development. A fetus has no rights, as it is not a person and is wholly dependent on the mother. The mother has passed the gauntlet of childhood illnesses and other nasty conditions/accidents and is ready to reproduce (obviously). She can do so at another time. If it's not right, for her, that's not anyone else's business. If it's really not right, she will turn to whatever means necessary.

    Forcing women to choose between huge health and life implications vs. a coat hanger is pure barbarism. In an enlightened society, half the population would have the ability and support to have this procedure done, at will, without judgement.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2