Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday October 09 2016, @03:39AM   Printer-friendly

The "quiet catastrophe" is particularly dismaying because it is so quiet, without social turmoil or even debate. It is this: After 88 consecutive months of the economic expansion that began in June 2009, a smaller percentage of American males in the prime working years (ages 25 to 54) are working than were working near the end of the Great Depression in 1940, when the unemployment rate was above 14 percent. If the labor-force participation rate were as high today as it was as recently as 2000, nearly 10 million more Americans would have jobs.

The work rate for adult men has plunged 13 percentage points in a half-century. This "work deficit" of "Great Depression-scale underutilization" of male potential workers is the subject of Nicholas Eberstadt's new monograph "Men Without Work: America's Invisible Crisis," which explores the economic and moral causes and consequences of this:

Is it an aberration, or a harbinger of things to come?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 10 2016, @03:53AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 10 2016, @03:53AM (#412300)

    > Actual studies on the topic, correcting for all the usual suspects (age, hours of work, experience) find, in the USA, that the percentile gap ascribable to sex is about

    Yes, if you factor out all the important stuff then its nearly equal. Yay! Equality!!
    But why is it that women works less hours and have less experience?

    Answer - because they are expected to sacrifice their careers for their family, especially single mothers who nearly always carry the entire burden of childcare. That's fucked up, and should be especially concerning to red pillars who believe society forbids them from putting the time in to care for their children.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 11 2016, @03:44PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 11 2016, @03:44PM (#412970)

    Ooh, good call there, chief!

    As soon as you find a way to fix that ugly biological reality of mammalian reproduction, let the world know.

    Go on, we're all waiting.

    What's taking so long?

    ... and not to distract you while you're working, but what the hell is a red pillar and why does it have opinions?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @04:19PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @04:19PM (#415240)

    The majority of "single mothers" are such because they made bad choices.

    Do you believe that nobody should suffer the consequences of their bad choices?

    If yes, you're the ideal Hillary voter. Free stuff for everyone! No consequences for anyone! W@@T!