Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday October 10 2016, @06:33AM   Printer-friendly
from the nice-words;-now,-how-about-some-action dept.

TechDirt reports

For quite some time now the FTC has been making lots of noises about the problems of the patent system and patent trolls in particular. While the US Patent Office itself has done little to address the problem, the FTC has recognized the harm patent trolling is doing to innovation and consumers. More than five years ago, the FTC released a big report on patent trolling and the problems it causes--suggesting that the Patent Office should start getting rid of vague patents with "indefinite" claims. That has happened a little bit, but much more because of the Supreme Court forcing the issue, rather than the USPTO listening to the FTC.

However, since then, it's appeared that the FTC has only grown more concerned. Basically every year we report that the FTC is investigating patent trolls in some form or another. [...] Since [2013], though, it's been mostly crickets.

[...]And now, finally, after all these years, the FTC has released its big report. It appears that 22 patent trolling operations responded to the subpoenas, though many had "affiliates and other related entities" allowing the FTC to study many more patent trolling operations overall. The study lumps patent trolls (they prefer the euphemistic "Patent Assertion Entities" or PAEs) into two categories: litigation trolls and portfolio trolls.

In short, litigation trolls are the smaller guys with just a small number of patents, who would threaten and sue companies (and quickly reach settlements) over those few patents. It's more of a "mom & pop" shakedown kind of business.

Portfolio trolls are the bigger, well funded operations, that have a massive portfolio of patents and play a more comprehensive shakedown game, going to lots of big companies and basically saying "you infringe on some of our patents, so give us a bunch of money to not figure out which ones." Think: Intellectual Ventures or Acacia.

[...]The study also looked at wireless chipset manufacturers (i.e., companies that actually implement products) to compare them to patent trolling operations. The key question here: do the actual implementers use patents in the same way to "protect" their business. As you might expect, they don't act very similar at all:

[Continues...]

We observed that Wireless Manufacturers sent demand letters before executing licenses, while Litigation PAEs sued before licensing their patents. Wireless Manufacturers and NPEs also sent nearly three times as many demand letters as all of the Study PAEs combined. Litigation PAEs brought nearly two-and-a-half times as many patent infringement cases involving wireless patents as Wireless Manufacturers (which collectively accounted for approximately 90% of worldwide chipset sales), NPEs, and Portfolio PAEs combined.

Wireless Manufacturer and Litigation PAE license characteristics also differed markedly. Wireless Manufacturer licenses frequently included field-of-use restrictions, cross-licenses, and complicated payment terms, whereas Litigation PAE licenses involved simple lump-sum payments with few restrictions, if any.

In short, the trolls' activity is inconsistent with the activity of actual innovators.

[...]All of the people who insist actual innovators need patents to protect their business, and that patent trolling is just a form of the same thing are full of it.

Previous: CAFC Judge: Software Patents Are Against the First Amendment


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Monday October 10 2016, @06:31PM

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 10 2016, @06:31PM (#412568) Journal

    Perhaps not leeches, but maggots are supreme at (nearly) painlessly debriding wounds. The only problems are 1) they're disgusting, and 2) they're a bit slow.

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Max Hyre on Monday October 10 2016, @09:14PM

    by Max Hyre (3427) <{maxhyre} {at} {yahoo.com}> on Monday October 10 2016, @09:14PM (#412641)
    Leeches have been used in recent years to help healing wounds, but now they're even FDA approved. [nbcnews.com]

    [The] FDA reports that leeches can help heal skin grafts by removing blood pooled under the graft and restore blood circulation in blocked veins by removing pooled blood.

    So, let's have a little respect here.