Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday October 10 2016, @07:53PM   Printer-friendly
from the Wer-hat-das-geschrieben? dept.

A biography of Adolf Hitler published two years before his autobiography Mein Kampf may also have been written by Hitler:

In the early fall of 1923, when Adolf Hitler was still mostly known for his frenzied speeches at Munich beer halls, a slim biography was published that lauded him as the savior of the German nation and even compared him to Jesus. The book, "Adolf Hitler: His Life and His Speeches," was credited to Baron Adolf Victor von Koerber, a German aristocrat and war hero. Scholars have said that Hitler sought Mr. von Koerber out for the biography because he needed a conservative figure without links to the Nazi Party to help legitimize him as a leader.

However, new research says Hitler penned the work himself. This suggests that Hitler had designs on taking power earlier than many historians have previously thought and manipulated public opinion to get there.

"Adolf Hitler: His Life and His Speeches" was published two years before "Mein Kampf," the autobiography and manifesto that historians consider the moment Hitler went from political propagandist to leader in waiting. The von Koerber biography was published shortly before Hitler helped lead a bungled coup in Munich known as the Beer Hall Putsch.

"It's 1923, and Hitler suddenly decides he needs to boost his national profile," said Thomas Weber, a professor of history and international affairs at the University of Aberdeen, in Scotland, who uncovered documents in Mr. von Koerber's archival papers that he argues reveals Hitler as the biography's true author. The documents included a sworn statement by the publisher's widow.

Dusty old Godwin meme.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Tuesday October 11 2016, @01:40PM

    by VLM (445) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 11 2016, @01:40PM (#412928)

    We're indoctrinated to say dictators are bad, and we're indoctrinated to carefully avoid noticing who fills the cemeteries faster.

    I'm well aware of giant piles of indoctrination and elaborate logic puzzles and sophistry, but pragmatically for example "bringing democracy to Iraq" has filled the cemeteries a lot faster than leaving them alone would have.

    Every time an American politician says they gonna bring democracy to some poor bastards, Satan, if there is one, laughs, because here comes unimaginable higher levels of pain, suffering, death. If you thought (correctly) that living under a dictatorship sometimes kinda suxs, for something even worse try regime change or enforced democracy.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by charon on Tuesday October 11 2016, @11:08PM

    by charon (5660) on Tuesday October 11 2016, @11:08PM (#413154) Journal
    You say democracy fills cemeteries? Dictatorship fills hidden mass graves. [nytimes.com]
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 12 2016, @04:00AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 12 2016, @04:00AM (#413265)

    You can't possibly be that stupid.
    Just because someone calls it democracy does not make it so.
    You might as well be arguing that the DPRK is a democracy because of the D.

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday October 12 2016, @04:01AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday October 12 2016, @04:01AM (#413266) Journal

    I'm well aware of giant piles of indoctrination and elaborate logic puzzles and sophistry, but pragmatically for example "bringing democracy to Iraq" has filled the cemeteries a lot faster than leaving them alone would have.

    Let us note that Syria handled the Arab Spring a whole lot poorer than Iraq did.

  • (Score: 2) by Zz9zZ on Wednesday October 12 2016, @06:11AM

    by Zz9zZ (1348) on Wednesday October 12 2016, @06:11AM (#413302)

    Well you're not wrong about reality being different than we'd hoped, however you're comparing the worst of one system with the best of another. Also, the wars waged by the US in the name of empire have been unwanted and looked down upon by quite a large fraction of the citizens. Even Iraq quickly lost support as the nationwide shock wore off.

    My point is that the US is not the shining example of democracy we like to imagine, and the deaths caused were hardly the will of the people. So using that as your measuring stick for democracy vs. dictatorship is pretty disingenuous. Not the worst comparison though, you could have chosen one a bit lower on the list: http://www.worldaudit.org/democracy.htm [worldaudit.org]

    Also, I was not recommending enforced regime change, the choice of government is highly dependent on the situation. Destabilizing the entire power structure of a country is a dangerous business best left to the people themselves, otherwise there is nothing in place to fill the vacuum. None of that changes the fact that dictatorships are worse overall. The idea that a dictatorship is a good idea shows just how far gone you are with the us vs. them mentality. If only you could get that one person into the seat of power who tells you what you want to hear and who will get rid of those you don't like... Gee, if only history had some good examples of just that, and if only we could recall how those turned out...

    --
    ~Tilting at windmills~