Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday October 10 2016, @04:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the if-only... dept.

There is an interview with Joel Spolsky on GeekWire which reports that companies should Just shut up and let your devs concentrate:

If you want to attract and keep developers, don't emphasize ping-pong tables, lounges, fire pits and chocolate fountains. Give them private offices or let them work from home, because uninterrupted time to concentrate is the most important and scarcest commodity.

That's the view of Joel Spolsky, CEO of Stack Overflow, a popular Q&A site for programmers, who spoke this morning at the GeekWire Summit in Seattle.

"Facebook's campus in Silicon Valley is an 8-acre open room, and Facebook was very pleased with itself for building what it thought was this amazing place for developers," Spolsky said in an interview with GeekWire co-founder Todd Bishop. "But developers don't want to overhear conversations. That's ideal for a trading floor, but developers need to concentrate, to go to a chatroom and ask questions and get the answers later. Facebook is paying 40-50 percent more than other places, which is usually a sign developers don't want to work there."

[Continues...]

Spolsky, who in 2011 created project-management software Trello, said the "Joel Test" that he created 16 years ago is still a valid way for developers to evaluate prospective employers. It's a list of 12 yes-no questions, with one point given for every "yes" answer:

  1. Do you use source control?
  2. Can you make a build in one step?
  3. Do you make daily builds?
  4. Do you have a bug database?
  5. Do you fix bugs before writing new code?
  6. Do you have an up-to-date schedule?
  7. Do you have a spec?
  8. Do programmers have quiet working conditions?
  9. Do you use the best tools money can buy?
  10. Do you have testers?
  11. Do new candidates write code during their interview?
  12. Do you do hallway usability testing?

"The truth is that most software organizations are running with a score of 2 or 3, and they need serious help, because companies like Microsoft run at 12 full-time," Spolsky said when he created the test. He said that remains true today.

How well does your organization support its developers? If new or better equipment would improve your productivity, is it made available to you? How is your work environment? How well does your organization score on the 12-point "Joel Test"? What is the biggest thing blocking your company from improving?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Aiwendil on Monday October 10 2016, @09:18PM

    by Aiwendil (531) on Monday October 10 2016, @09:18PM (#412644) Journal

    No, it wouldn't - uncertified coders and programmers are a pest in those fields.
    And higher code quality? I kinda doubt that - degraded cables (fatigue due to temperature variations) are more common than software errors in those fields and - excepting IFFs - no NDAs either).

    Also - best practice and common solutions makes the nasty assumption that the underlying hardware are the same (or suitable) which very often are not the case. (Even six months difference in deployment can mean a vendor has gone out of buisness, or that new cable qualities are in use, or an insulator has been outlawed, or a poltician has decided on a new standard. Once you leave the world of pure software such things causes a lot of variations)

    The [non site-specific] auditing would also be close to useless unless all variations are checked for and that would be impossible due to it being hard to foresee laws and politics and technological advances.

    I actually would trust open source less than industrially verified one-off code with proper documentation (what would you rather see control the aiplane you're on - boeing/airbus internal verified code or systemd ;)
    (Or a bit more serious - who would you rather make the controller for the 200kV switch - a company with 60+ years experience and database of issues or a mix of whoever stumbled in on its github-page?)

    And no, this isn't as much security through obscurity as it is that we don't want people to even considering doing anything without consulting, writing and supplying proper documentation.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by hendrikboom on Tuesday October 11 2016, @05:54PM

    by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 11 2016, @05:54PM (#413027) Homepage Journal

    I actually would trust open source less than industrially verified one-off code with proper documentation

    I actually would trust industrially verified open-source code with proper documentation even more.