Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday October 11 2016, @08:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the overcast-with-a-chance-of-light-wood dept.

The pre-industrial atmosphere contained more particles, and so brighter clouds, than we previously thought. This is the latest finding of the CLOUD experiment, a collaboration between around 80 scientists at the CERN particle physics lab near Geneva. It changes our understanding of what was in the atmosphere before humans began adding pollution – and what it might be like again in the future.

Most cloud droplets need tiny airborne particles to act as "seeds" for their formation and growth. If a cloud has more of these seeds, and therefore more droplets, it will appear brighter and reflect away more sunlight from the Earth's surface. This in turn can cool the climate. Therefore understanding the number and size of particles in the atmosphere is vital to predicting not only how bright and reflective the planet's clouds are, but what global temperatures will be.
...
The CLOUD experiment at CERN also recently discovered that gases emitted by trees can stick together to make new seeds for clouds in the atmosphere – without needing any help from other pollutants as was previously thought. Scientists had thought that the cloud seeds needed sulphuric acid (often mixed with other compounds) or iodine molecules to stick together to initiate the process.

In our new follow-up study, published in PNAS, we worked with other CLOUD scientists to simulate this process in the atmosphere. Our work suggests that even today trees produce a large fraction of cloud seeds over the cleanest forested parts of the world.

More trees means more clouds, which means cooler Earth.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 11 2016, @09:31PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 11 2016, @09:31PM (#413125)

    No grasses? Or forbs? Or lichens? Or .... nope, just trees?

    Is there a magnitude change? A qualitative difference?

    What about different trees - larch versus maple, or fir versus pine?

  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Tuesday October 11 2016, @09:37PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday October 11 2016, @09:37PM (#413130)

    Burn them all. It will release tiny particles which will help to form clouds.
    The scorched earth will also be more prone to releasing dust in the wind and form clouds.
    In fact, when it turns into a desert of fine sand, there will be more particles and therefore more clouds.
    The more desert, the more rain ... QED!

    Humidiwhat?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 13 2016, @11:48AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 13 2016, @11:48AM (#413842)

    Just trees for very good reasons - trees also produce the moisture you need for clouds to be formed in the first place.

    Places like Amazon are a rain forest because of the forest, not the rain. The rain is caused by the trees. You kill the trees sufficiently, Amazon will become the next Sahara.