Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Saturday October 15 2016, @03:56PM   Printer-friendly
from the royalty-update dept.

Thailand's popular and long-reigning king has died:

Thailand's King Bhumibol Adulyadej, the world's longest-reigning monarch, has died after 70 years as head of state. The 88-year-old king was widely revered but had been in poor health in recent years, making few public appearances. He was seen as a stabilising figure in a country hit by cycles of political turmoil and multiple coups. Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn will be the new monarch, the prime minister has said.

[...] In a televised address to the nation, Prime Minister Prayut Chan-ocha said Thailand would hold a one-year mourning period, that flags would fly half-mast and all entertainment functions must be "toned down" for a month. In a later statement he urged vigilance, saying national security was a top priority. "Everyone will need to be alert in every region and throughout the country to ensure safety", he said. The king's death comes as Thailand remains under military rule following a coup in 2014. [...] King Bhumibol was widely respected across Thailand, and thought of by many as semi-divine. [...] King Bhumibol, who was born in Cambridge in the US state of Massachusetts, acceded to the throne on 9 June 1946 after his brother, King Ananda Mahidol, died.

Though a constitutional monarch with limited official powers, many Thais looked to King Bhumibol to him to intervene in times of high tension. He was seen as a unifying and calming influence through numerous coups and 20 constitutions. However, his critics argued he had endorsed military takeovers and at times had failed to speak out against human rights abuses.

Also at NPR, CNN, and the Bangkok Post, which appears to have turned its website grayscale with a CSS filter (also note: "The discussion board on this article has been turned off, because commenting on the above issue may cause legal dispute.").


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 15 2016, @10:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 15 2016, @10:33PM (#414689)

    " The military government often punished people for supposedly insulting the king - against that kind's wishes. "

    Faux outrage does not cut it.

    He could have campaigned and pressured. In fact, to NOT do so when you are the object of the law makes you a BAD guy.

    But he didn't. He does not get to have all this bullshit AND be called a nice guy because he felt bad about it.

    Fuck him.