Navinder Sarao has lost his appeal and is set to be extradited to the USA, where he faces charges with a possible maximum sentence of 380 years. He is accused of causing the "flash crash" in 2010, when the Dow Jones index dropped by 1000 points. He ran his trading from his bedroom in his parents' house and it is claimed that he made more than £30M (approximately $40M) in 5 years. His parents had no idea what he was doing, nor the scale of his income. He is accused of placing trades that he never intended to fill, so, to this naive person, it's hard to distinguish what he did from that of the large high-speed trading firms.
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Monday October 17 2016, @09:30AM
He is not going to jail - he is going to stand trial for the alleged offences, which have yet to be proven.
However, the US judicial system being what it is, I suspect the trial is superfluous to the outcome. This is for someone who has never entered the United States, and is not under their jurisdiction. And before you say that he 'committed a crime' in the US, why aren't the systems protected against such transactions, and why does the US never extradite its citizens when they commit crimes overseas? I do wonder why the UK government insists that this is the 'right' thing to do.
From the second link in TFS:
The failure seems to be that the system created is too fragile to even survive that actions of one single individual. But let's incarcerate him anyway rather than try to change the system. There is a profit in the former (for those running the penal system) but nothing in the latter.