During this Nobel Prize season where we celebrate the annual winners, Nature has gone through the Nobel archives and compiled a top ten list of the most nominated, but never won people. The "winners" are:
The Nobel commission doesn't reveal nomination information for at least 50 years, so one can't say who really has the most nominations. There are a plethora of reasons these people never won the award because the prestige of the prize brings in a variety of factors that have little to do with merit.
"A kaleidoscope of human agency is necessarily involved in awarding the Nobel Prize, as with any other prize," says Friedman. "There are no grounds for assuming the winners of the Nobel Prize constitute a unique population of the very 'best' in science."
(Score: 1) by Francis on Monday October 17 2016, @09:03PM
And you don't think being the first black man elected to be head of state of a non-black country doesn't deserve recognition?
Regardless of ones views of what he did with the opportunity, proving to the world that black people can be heads of state in places where they aren't the majority is a lot more important than a lot of the other things they've handed the award for. I'm not sure why people bitch about Obama when others are far less deserving. Yasser Arafat springs instantly to mind.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @10:26PM
In his youth, black men who couldn't get into college and couldn't subsequently get student deferments ended up in Vietnam, then in body bags.
...yet Obama is a Neoconservative, ratcheting up the war machine even worse than Dubya.
Regardless of [ones'] views of what he did with the opportunity
He has made every attempt to join the 1 Percent and has feathered his nest at the expense of Joe Average.
...and, in particular, he hasn't ended the racist War on Drugs nor improved the racist "justice" system.
He's an oreo. [urbandictionary.com]
-- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]