Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday October 17 2016, @12:35PM   Printer-friendly
from the hot-or-cold dept.

Submitted via IRC for khallow

Scientists have provided a solid foundation for an alternative theory to help explain how the early universe took shape.

This theory, first devised two decades ago, proposes that the dominant expansion in the early universe some 14 billion years ago, known as cosmological inflation, took place in a warm environment. The idea differs from existing theories which state that this time of change took place during a cold period.

[...]

This work contradicts prevailing beliefs in the field that if would be near impossible to devise a compelling model, based on first principles, for this theory. Their idea takes into account a scientific process known as the Little Higgs mechanism, which stabilises the mass of sub-atomic particles known as Higgs bosons.

Their theory combines this mechanism with the concept that energy produced in the early universe allows for a continuous warm temperature.

Source: http://phys.org/news/2016-10-theory-redraws-formation-early-universe.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @02:54PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @02:54PM (#415208)
    This story perfectly illustrates how science has become philosophy.
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @03:16PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @03:16PM (#415212)

    No, it doesn't.

    FTFA:

    Their idea showed very good agreement with satellite measurements of temperature fluctuations in the early universe.

    That's exactly what distinguishes science from philosophy: Comparison with experimental data.

  • (Score: 0, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @08:31PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @08:31PM (#415379)

    Science is philosophy. Always has been.