Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday October 17 2016, @02:08PM   Printer-friendly
from the let-them-hear-your-voice dept.

The Washington Times reports [Link no longer available]

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration [DEA] will hold off on a previously-announced ban of the herbal drug Kratom while soliciting additional input from the public and the Food and Drug Administration [FDA].

A DEA announcement in August that it planned to add the psychoactive compounds in Kratom to the list of Schedule I drugs[1] banned under the Controlled Substances Act drew outrage from individuals who believe the herbal supplement, which is derived from trees indigenous to Southeast Asia, can help individuals struggling with opioid addiction.

"Since publishing that notice, DEA has received numerous comments from members of the public challenging the scheduling action and requesting that the agency consider those comments and accompanying information before taking further action," states a notice[PDF] issued [October 12] by the DEA that it will withdraw its proposal to ban the substance.

[...] In addition to accepting public comments[2] on Kratom through December 1, the DEA has also asked for a scientific and medical evaluation of the drug by the FDA. [DEA spokesman Melvin] Patterson said the DEA initially asked for such an assessment in 2014, but never received the results and opted to go forward with the ban without the assessment.

[...] Susan Ash, who founded the American Kratom Association in 2014 to advocate for users of the drug, said [...] "We believe Kratom should not be scheduled in any way, shape or form," Ms. Ash said. "It's been consumed safely for decades in the U.S. and world-wide for millennium, so there is no impetus to make it a controlled substance."

[1] Claimed to have no legit medical value and a high potential for abuse (as Cannabis is classified)

[2] Their directions are in the PDF, which tells you to go to a ridiculous page which is driven by scripts and use the code Docket No. DEA-442W. It's as if they want to make it as difficult as possible to comment.

Previous: The Calm Before the Kratom Ban


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by RedBear on Monday October 17 2016, @08:37PM

    by RedBear (1734) on Monday October 17 2016, @08:37PM (#415384)

    Fellow Soylentils,

    I've never before been motivated enough to get involved in something like this. I don't smoke (tobacco) or drink (alcohol) and rarely even drink coffee (caffeine) much less have a history of using any other substances. Not because I'm morally superior to anyone but probably mostly because I was just never around the right crowd of people. But even as a veritable teetotaler I am deeply tired of the economic and social devastation that has been directly caused by the eternal War on Drugs. The idea that the DEA wants to not just continue refusing to acknowledge that they never had a good reason to put something like marijuana on Schedule I, but that they want to expand the drug war with yet another natural substance that seems to be almost entirely harmless, absolutely infuriates me. The drug war needs to be winding down in the 21st century, not ramping up. It costs taxpayers billions of dollars a year and devastates many other nations around the world.

    I hope that as many people as possible on this forum will go leave a comment on this (and spread the word on any other forums you might frequent). I have nearly zero hope that the DEA will be forced to change their minds on this, but the fact that they even temporarily backed off their original proposal already seems like a minor miracle, so who knows. Even if it doesn't seem like it could possibly make a difference, I feel like I have to do something to actively oppose the expansion of the DEA's insanity. This is the comment I'm leaving. It's not very well written and provides no links to supporting data. Maybe some of you could do much better. There's a 5000 character limit on the text box.

    Kratom is helping Americans break free from opioid dependance caused by heroin and prescription opioid painkillers. The substance has no record of having high abuse potential and no scientifically established link to a statistically relevant number of deaths that can be directly linked to the substance itself versus pre-existing health issues. This is eerily similar to the complete lack of scientific evidence that marijuana is any more dangerous than tobacco. Taking this tool (kratom/mitragynine) away from the hundreds of thousands of Americans fighting opioid addiction and risk of death from opioid overdose is unconscionable. Outlawing kratom will simply create a black market for the substance driven by those desperately seeking to escape or mitigate opioid addiction, which will add to the economic burden the drug war already places upon the American taxpayer, and put American lives at greater risk. There is no supportable argument for spending taxpayer funds waging war on yet another nearly harmless natural substance, especially one that is helping Americans avoid the use of a much more harmful substance.

    I went to the link in the summary and couldn't even find the right page using the given search term. So I used the deep link "isostatic" posted above: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=DEA-2016-0015-0006 [regulations.gov] .

    --
    ¯\_ʕ◔.◔ʔ_/¯ LOL. I dunno. I'm just a bear.
    ... Peace out. Got bear stuff to do. 彡ʕ⌐■.■ʔ
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5