Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Monday October 17 2016, @03:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the keep-your-eyes-on-the-road dept.

Germany's Federal Motor Authority recently sent letters to Tesla drivers reminding them that the "Autopilot" function is for driver assistance, not replacement. Now, Tesla is being warned against advertising the feature:

German Transport Minister Alexander Dobrindt has asked Tesla to stop advertising its electric vehicles as having an Autopilot function as this might suggest drivers' attention is not needed, his ministry said on Sunday.

A spokeswoman for the ministry, confirming a report in the daily Bild am Sonntag (BamS), said the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) had written to Tesla to make the request. "It can be confirmed that a letter to Tesla exists with the request to no longer use the misleading term Autopilot for the driver assistance system of the car," she said in a written response to a Reuters' query.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Rosco P. Coltrane on Monday October 17 2016, @04:24PM

    by Rosco P. Coltrane (4757) on Monday October 17 2016, @04:24PM (#415245)

    where German people have a thing called "the internet", and in 2 seconds flat, they can visit sites from abroad where Tesla cars are listed as having an autopilot feature. Besides, geeky and well-to-do Tesla owners especially, more than any other automobile brand owners, are likely to know all there is to know about their cars.

    I'm always amazed that national institutions think banning advertisement of this or that within their national borders makes any difference whatsoever. People know what's going on outside the increasingly artificial boundaries of their countries, and if they can't get to the information they want, they always find a way around the censorship.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @04:38PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @04:38PM (#415251)

    So wanting to prevent companies from making misleading claims is now censorship?

    I presume you must be one of those who have a large stake in the dietary supplements business.

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 17 2016, @04:40PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 17 2016, @04:40PM (#415252) Journal
      What makes the claim misleading? Autopilots in airplanes don't do magic either. Doesn't the German government have something useful to do?
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @04:59PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @04:59PM (#415264)

        > Autopilots in airplanes don't do magic either.

        And if Tesla were advertising to pilots that would be relevant.
        But they aren't. And thus the definition of "autopilot" as understood by the general population is what matters.

        Pointing at a relatively obscure technical definition is a cop-out.

        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 17 2016, @05:26PM

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 17 2016, @05:26PM (#415274) Journal

          And thus the definition of "autopilot" as understood by the general population is what matters.

          Sorry, I don't buy that. And I think a few large tickets for reckless driving "on autopilot" would disabuse the public of that notion too.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @05:56PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @05:56PM (#415294)

            So all tesla's should have a giant warning light/sign like a dominos pizza car that says "ASSHOLE USING DANGEROUS AUTOPILOT FEATURE"

            Seems fair to me!

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @06:05PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @06:05PM (#415298)

            > Sorry, I don't buy that.

            And no one is surprised. You regularly demonstrate a failure to understand all the people who do not live in your own head.
            This is just the latest example of your callow, "I'm right, everybody else is wrong" logic.

            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 17 2016, @07:45PM

              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 17 2016, @07:45PM (#415337) Journal

              And no one is surprised. You regularly demonstrate a failure to understand all the people who do not live in your own head. This is just the latest example of your callow, "I'm right, everybody else is wrong" logic.

              Be right and we'll have something to talk about. I doubt I have any failure to understand you.

              Banning stuff because people are stupid opens the floodgates to never ending imposition. If someone can't figure out before they buy a Tesla that autopilot doesn't mean that the driver can just blow off driving, then they have no business driving. Fine them a bunch of money and take their license away. That's how real world law enforcement should work. Sane laws and appropriate punishments when people do things that are insanely reckless.

              But some mealy mouthed bureaucrat having the power to decide that you can't do or say something just because people are stupid? That's a blank check for the bureaucrat to ban anything they want.

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @08:56PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @08:56PM (#415401)

                Waiting for the crime to occur is actually a problem. No i don't mean pre-crime their asses to jail, rather that sensible prevention such as stopping clearly wrong ads or disvertising to to to masses is perfectly legitimate.

                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @09:02PM

                  by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @09:02PM (#415410)

                  > stopping clearly wrong ads or disvertising to the masses is perfectly legitimate.

                  Sorry, I don't buy that.

                • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday October 18 2016, @08:40PM

                  by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 18 2016, @08:40PM (#415837) Journal

                  disvertising

                  Even if we were to assume that is a real word, no one has yet to show what Tesla is supposedly "disvertising" about. So yes, I don't buy it once again. They just didn't give me enough gullibility to cover all these baseless claims made in this discussion.

          • (Score: 2) by weeds on Monday October 17 2016, @07:28PM

            by weeds (611) on Monday October 17 2016, @07:28PM (#415330) Journal

            You can buy or sell whatever you want. That doesn't change what is actually true.
            An aircraft autopilot and a automobile autopilot have just about nothing in common except the name. I wonder how many people have any idea at all what they do let alone how they work? In the (notably small) sample I have checked, the answer was "drive the car" or "fly the plane".

            The most commonly used aircraft autopilot uses instrumentation to maintain a flight path by controlling up to all three axis and altitude. In most uses, they are used to maintain attitude and altitude (continue straight and level flight at altitude.) I'm not saying this is all they do, just that it is what they are mostly used for. Landing systems might be described as doing "scene recognition" in the most extreme case, but using radar to determine altitude is not the same as what a car does to recognize a scene. An aircraft autoland system uses a radio signal (advanced ILS) to land the plane (a radio signal, not scene recognition). No aircraft is going to confuse a big truck with sky since it doesn't know or care anything about either. By the way, they are used by pilots, who get a heck of a lot more training than any driver.

            What I'm buying is that the understanding by the general public is all that matters.

            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 17 2016, @08:01PM

              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 17 2016, @08:01PM (#415355) Journal

              What I'm buying is that the understanding by the general public is all that matters.

              Here's the obvious rebuttal. Does the general public drive Teslas? Answer: no, they don't. And even a rudimentary education effort (for example, a pamphlet that describes what the Telsa's autopilot feature actually does and how it works) would be sufficient to educate Tesla drivers as to what expectations they should have for the feature.

              We shouldn't be compromising our society just because some people are stupid. If someone plunks down a large amount of Euros just because they heard that the Tesla has autopilot without even a little bit of effort to figure out what that autopilot is or does, then fuck them. If they then take it on the road and get caught snoozing while autopiloting, then heavily fine them, take their license, and possibly their Telsa away. If they then, kill other people in an accident, that's multiple cases of the German variation of manslaughter or negligent homicide. Let the wheels of justice grind. All the machinery to discourage people from killing other people with "autopilot" is already in place in Germany and elsewhere.

              None of that excuses this abuse of power. There's never a reason to prohibit a business from using a straightforward name just because a clueless bureaucrat thinks stupid people won't get it. Sure, there are functional and implementation differences [soylentnews.org] between what Tesla terms "autopilot" and what is an autopilot in an aircraft. It's still a pretty accurate name for the system and likely to get more accurate as time goes on.

              • (Score: 2) by weeds on Monday October 17 2016, @08:29PM

                by weeds (611) on Monday October 17 2016, @08:29PM (#415378) Journal

                "There's never a reason to prohibit a business from using a straightforward name..."

                Actually, there is, it's called false advertising. One pilots an aircraft, they drive a car. Calling the car's driver assist system an autopilot is a misnomer to begin with. The car's "autopilot" does not do what an aircraft autopilot does as any pilot can tell you. If it did, it would maintain heading, altitude, and airspeed (forgot that one in previous post.) Not much use in a car.

                Sitting back and watching stupid people kill themselves (and others) owing to their stupidity may make for enjoyable theater for some.

                • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 17 2016, @08:41PM

                  by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 17 2016, @08:41PM (#415387) Journal
                  Ok, what is the false advertising? Are people unclear that Teslas are cars rather than planes or boats?

                  And frankly, there are plenty of misnomers if we look even trivially at any part of society, like a computer. Where are the "keys" of a modern keyboard? All I see are buttons! The mouse isn't a real mouse. I want my money spent on the exercise wheel back. Male and female connectors, think of the children! Computer "memory" that forgets the moment you turn it off. A web browser? What twigs and shoots does it eat and where is its mouth? These strange technological terms frighten and confuse me!

                  I think it is telling that people keep speaking of Tesla's supposed misleading or false advertising without actually coming up with an example of it.
                • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 17 2016, @08:43PM

                  by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 17 2016, @08:43PM (#415390) Journal

                  Sitting back and watching stupid people kill themselves (and others) owing to their stupidity may make for enjoyable theater for some.

                  Changing the name of the system to something which is perceived as being slightly more innocuous (there really isn't much room for improvement here) isn't going to make stupid people less stupid.

                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @09:04PM

                  by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @09:04PM (#415412)

                  > The car's "autopilot" does not do what an aircraft autopilot does as any pilot can tell you

                  Sorry, I don't buy that.

                  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 18 2016, @07:28AM

                    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 18 2016, @07:28AM (#415574)

                    Try it yourself, then. Drive a to the top of a cliff. Set Tesla auto pilot to "maintain altitude". Drive off cliff.

                    If you survive, you were right.

                    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday October 18 2016, @08:34PM

                      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 18 2016, @08:34PM (#415832) Journal

                      Set Tesla auto pilot to "maintain altitude".

                      You do realize that a Tesla maintains its altitude just fine on a road?

      • (Score: 2, Touché) by janrinok on Monday October 17 2016, @06:40PM

        by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 17 2016, @06:40PM (#415313) Journal

        But they do allow pilots to take their hands away from the controls and concentrate on other tasks for short periods of time. Tesla's 'autopilot' does not.

        • (Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Monday October 17 2016, @07:13PM

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 17 2016, @07:13PM (#415327) Journal
          Ok, that's a reasonable point.
        • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @09:08PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @09:08PM (#415414)

          But they do allow pilots to take their hands away from the controls and concentrate on other tasks for short periods of time. Tesla's 'autopilot' does not.

          What are you talking about?
          Have you not seen all the videos of people doing exactly that?

          Here's one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqnJRo4FQNo [youtube.com]
          There are tons more.

          Tesla's autopilot does substantially more than an aircraft autopilot. And that's the root of problem.

          • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Tuesday October 18 2016, @07:06AM

            by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 18 2016, @07:06AM (#415569) Journal
            The root of the problem is that people shouldn't be relying on the Tesla autopilot to the extent that they are doing. The whole point of the German advice is to tell people to stop relying on the autopilot. The claims made by Tesla are misleading and the German government is asking Tesla politely to be more truthful and comply with EU legislation. If they don't respond to a polite request then there are certainly other avenues that the German government could choose to follow e.g. not giving Tesla a certificate of road worthiness in Germany. Tesla can keep the driver assist, call it an autopilot, but they couldn't sell their cars. Now which do you think Tesla would prefer?

            What are you talking about? Have you not seen all the videos of people doing exactly that [... concentrating on other tasks]?

            that the "Autopilot" function is for driver assistance,

            Exactly, we know it happens - idiots even show themselves on Youtube doing it - but they should concentrate on driving the car.

          • (Score: 2) by urza9814 on Thursday October 20 2016, @08:14PM

            by urza9814 (3954) on Thursday October 20 2016, @08:14PM (#416913) Journal

            But they do allow pilots to take their hands away from the controls and concentrate on other tasks for short periods of time. Tesla's 'autopilot' does not.

            What are you talking about?
            Have you not seen all the videos of people doing exactly that?

            Thank you for demonstrating *the exact problem TFA is discussing*.

            Because according to Tesla's own website, that ISN'T actually true. Yes, people do it, but the technology *is not designed to be capable of doing that*. What you're saying is equivalent to saying that a Galaxy Note 7 has a built-in cigarette lighter. Sure, you COULD use it for that under certain circumstances, but that's still not a true statement.

            In its current form, Autopilot is an advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) that classifies as a Level 2 automated system by the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA). It is designed as a hands-on experience to give drivers more confidence behind the wheel, increase their safety on the road, and make highway driving more enjoyable by reducing the driver’s workload.

            Autopilot’s safety and convenience capabilities are designed to be additive to the driver’s by augmenting their perception, improving their decision making, and assisting in their control of the vehicle. Its user interface has been carefully designed to encourage proper use and to give drivers intuitive access to the information the car is using to inform its actions, via a detailed visual display on the instrument panel and clear audible cues. As Autopilot technology continues to be developed, more advanced functionality will be made available to Tesla owners over time nearing full self-driving capabilities; however, until truly driverless cars are developed and approved by regulators, the driver is responsible for and must remain in control of their car at all times.

              - https://www.tesla.com/presskit/autopilot#autopilot [tesla.com] (emphasis added)

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 17 2016, @08:08PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 17 2016, @08:08PM (#415358) Journal
      I notice no one has yet to present a case that Tesla's branding is misleading. It's all about what an imaginary "general public" would think, ignoring that Tesla drivers are not the general public and can readily be targeted by education efforts (such as a pamphlet or website that tells you what the "autopilot" can and can't do, and how it works, which can be read prior to any purchase of a Tesla).
      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @09:57PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @09:57PM (#415438)

        Ah, I see. Tesla owners are not only richer than your average person, but clearly more intelligent too.

        I'm sure their farts don't stink either.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 18 2016, @07:33AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 18 2016, @07:33AM (#415578)

        I notice no one has yet to present a case that Tesla's branding is misleading

        Go on Youtube, search for Tesla autopilot. See how many of them think the "autopilot" allows you to take your hands off the steering wheel.

        The so-called "autopilot" is not approved for that, and Tesla even insists that it is NOT good enough for driving without your hands on the steering wheel. Calling it "autopilot" misleads people into thinking that it will allow them to do that.

        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday October 18 2016, @02:22PM

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 18 2016, @02:22PM (#415676) Journal
          Again, what's misleading about the term? I'm not wasting my time with ignorant people who don't know have a clue and don't own a Tesla. Tesla can educate Tesla owners by simple means.