Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Monday October 17 2016, @03:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the keep-your-eyes-on-the-road dept.

Germany's Federal Motor Authority recently sent letters to Tesla drivers reminding them that the "Autopilot" function is for driver assistance, not replacement. Now, Tesla is being warned against advertising the feature:

German Transport Minister Alexander Dobrindt has asked Tesla to stop advertising its electric vehicles as having an Autopilot function as this might suggest drivers' attention is not needed, his ministry said on Sunday.

A spokeswoman for the ministry, confirming a report in the daily Bild am Sonntag (BamS), said the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) had written to Tesla to make the request. "It can be confirmed that a letter to Tesla exists with the request to no longer use the misleading term Autopilot for the driver assistance system of the car," she said in a written response to a Reuters' query.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 17 2016, @05:26PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 17 2016, @05:26PM (#415274) Journal

    And thus the definition of "autopilot" as understood by the general population is what matters.

    Sorry, I don't buy that. And I think a few large tickets for reckless driving "on autopilot" would disabuse the public of that notion too.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @05:56PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @05:56PM (#415294)

    So all tesla's should have a giant warning light/sign like a dominos pizza car that says "ASSHOLE USING DANGEROUS AUTOPILOT FEATURE"

    Seems fair to me!

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @06:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @06:05PM (#415298)

    > Sorry, I don't buy that.

    And no one is surprised. You regularly demonstrate a failure to understand all the people who do not live in your own head.
    This is just the latest example of your callow, "I'm right, everybody else is wrong" logic.

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 17 2016, @07:45PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 17 2016, @07:45PM (#415337) Journal

      And no one is surprised. You regularly demonstrate a failure to understand all the people who do not live in your own head. This is just the latest example of your callow, "I'm right, everybody else is wrong" logic.

      Be right and we'll have something to talk about. I doubt I have any failure to understand you.

      Banning stuff because people are stupid opens the floodgates to never ending imposition. If someone can't figure out before they buy a Tesla that autopilot doesn't mean that the driver can just blow off driving, then they have no business driving. Fine them a bunch of money and take their license away. That's how real world law enforcement should work. Sane laws and appropriate punishments when people do things that are insanely reckless.

      But some mealy mouthed bureaucrat having the power to decide that you can't do or say something just because people are stupid? That's a blank check for the bureaucrat to ban anything they want.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @08:56PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @08:56PM (#415401)

        Waiting for the crime to occur is actually a problem. No i don't mean pre-crime their asses to jail, rather that sensible prevention such as stopping clearly wrong ads or disvertising to to to masses is perfectly legitimate.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @09:02PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @09:02PM (#415410)

          > stopping clearly wrong ads or disvertising to the masses is perfectly legitimate.

          Sorry, I don't buy that.

        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday October 18 2016, @08:40PM

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 18 2016, @08:40PM (#415837) Journal

          disvertising

          Even if we were to assume that is a real word, no one has yet to show what Tesla is supposedly "disvertising" about. So yes, I don't buy it once again. They just didn't give me enough gullibility to cover all these baseless claims made in this discussion.

  • (Score: 2) by weeds on Monday October 17 2016, @07:28PM

    by weeds (611) on Monday October 17 2016, @07:28PM (#415330) Journal

    You can buy or sell whatever you want. That doesn't change what is actually true.
    An aircraft autopilot and a automobile autopilot have just about nothing in common except the name. I wonder how many people have any idea at all what they do let alone how they work? In the (notably small) sample I have checked, the answer was "drive the car" or "fly the plane".

    The most commonly used aircraft autopilot uses instrumentation to maintain a flight path by controlling up to all three axis and altitude. In most uses, they are used to maintain attitude and altitude (continue straight and level flight at altitude.) I'm not saying this is all they do, just that it is what they are mostly used for. Landing systems might be described as doing "scene recognition" in the most extreme case, but using radar to determine altitude is not the same as what a car does to recognize a scene. An aircraft autoland system uses a radio signal (advanced ILS) to land the plane (a radio signal, not scene recognition). No aircraft is going to confuse a big truck with sky since it doesn't know or care anything about either. By the way, they are used by pilots, who get a heck of a lot more training than any driver.

    What I'm buying is that the understanding by the general public is all that matters.

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 17 2016, @08:01PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 17 2016, @08:01PM (#415355) Journal

      What I'm buying is that the understanding by the general public is all that matters.

      Here's the obvious rebuttal. Does the general public drive Teslas? Answer: no, they don't. And even a rudimentary education effort (for example, a pamphlet that describes what the Telsa's autopilot feature actually does and how it works) would be sufficient to educate Tesla drivers as to what expectations they should have for the feature.

      We shouldn't be compromising our society just because some people are stupid. If someone plunks down a large amount of Euros just because they heard that the Tesla has autopilot without even a little bit of effort to figure out what that autopilot is or does, then fuck them. If they then take it on the road and get caught snoozing while autopiloting, then heavily fine them, take their license, and possibly their Telsa away. If they then, kill other people in an accident, that's multiple cases of the German variation of manslaughter or negligent homicide. Let the wheels of justice grind. All the machinery to discourage people from killing other people with "autopilot" is already in place in Germany and elsewhere.

      None of that excuses this abuse of power. There's never a reason to prohibit a business from using a straightforward name just because a clueless bureaucrat thinks stupid people won't get it. Sure, there are functional and implementation differences [soylentnews.org] between what Tesla terms "autopilot" and what is an autopilot in an aircraft. It's still a pretty accurate name for the system and likely to get more accurate as time goes on.

      • (Score: 2) by weeds on Monday October 17 2016, @08:29PM

        by weeds (611) on Monday October 17 2016, @08:29PM (#415378) Journal

        "There's never a reason to prohibit a business from using a straightforward name..."

        Actually, there is, it's called false advertising. One pilots an aircraft, they drive a car. Calling the car's driver assist system an autopilot is a misnomer to begin with. The car's "autopilot" does not do what an aircraft autopilot does as any pilot can tell you. If it did, it would maintain heading, altitude, and airspeed (forgot that one in previous post.) Not much use in a car.

        Sitting back and watching stupid people kill themselves (and others) owing to their stupidity may make for enjoyable theater for some.

        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 17 2016, @08:41PM

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 17 2016, @08:41PM (#415387) Journal
          Ok, what is the false advertising? Are people unclear that Teslas are cars rather than planes or boats?

          And frankly, there are plenty of misnomers if we look even trivially at any part of society, like a computer. Where are the "keys" of a modern keyboard? All I see are buttons! The mouse isn't a real mouse. I want my money spent on the exercise wheel back. Male and female connectors, think of the children! Computer "memory" that forgets the moment you turn it off. A web browser? What twigs and shoots does it eat and where is its mouth? These strange technological terms frighten and confuse me!

          I think it is telling that people keep speaking of Tesla's supposed misleading or false advertising without actually coming up with an example of it.
        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 17 2016, @08:43PM

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 17 2016, @08:43PM (#415390) Journal

          Sitting back and watching stupid people kill themselves (and others) owing to their stupidity may make for enjoyable theater for some.

          Changing the name of the system to something which is perceived as being slightly more innocuous (there really isn't much room for improvement here) isn't going to make stupid people less stupid.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @09:04PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @09:04PM (#415412)

          > The car's "autopilot" does not do what an aircraft autopilot does as any pilot can tell you

          Sorry, I don't buy that.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 18 2016, @07:28AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 18 2016, @07:28AM (#415574)

            Try it yourself, then. Drive a to the top of a cliff. Set Tesla auto pilot to "maintain altitude". Drive off cliff.

            If you survive, you were right.

            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday October 18 2016, @08:34PM

              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 18 2016, @08:34PM (#415832) Journal

              Set Tesla auto pilot to "maintain altitude".

              You do realize that a Tesla maintains its altitude just fine on a road?