Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday October 17 2016, @05:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the debugging-from-960-million-kilometers-away dept.

A critical moment in NASA'S Juno mission has been postponed while engineers at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory attempt to sort out a mysterious engine issue. If the problem is not resolved quickly, it could reduce the amount of high-quality data the Jupiter-orbiting probe is able to collect during its scientific mission.

On October 19th, at its point of closest approach to Jupiter (called periapsis), the Juno spacecraft was scheduled to perform its final main engine burn, a "period reduction maneuver" that would narrow its orbit from 53.4 days to 2 weeks. Once in its "science orbit," the spacecraft's main data collection phase will commence.

But on Friday, the space agency decided to delay the burn due to an unexpected issue with a pair of helium valves that are part of the engine's fuel pressurization system. As Juno project manager Rick Nybakken said in a news release, these valves "did not operate as expected during a command sequence that was initiated [Thursday]."

"The valves should have opened in a few seconds, but it took several minutes," Nybakken continued. "We need to better understand this issue before moving forward with a burn of the main engine."

http://gizmodo.com/something-went-wrong-with-the-juno-spacecrafts-engine-1787873807

[Source]: NASA

More Info About Juno Mission


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday October 17 2016, @09:08PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday October 17 2016, @09:08PM (#415413) Journal

    I was gonna poo in your general direction, but honestly, let's just wait until January 2017. Because by then, emdrive may be anointed or broken (a peer-reviewed paper will be published in December).

    Then there's this:

    http://www.zmescience.com/science/news-science/second-generation-em-drive-just-around-corner-patent-made-public-friday/ [zmescience.com]

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @09:50PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 17 2016, @09:50PM (#415436)

    The EM Drive again, huh? That's always good for a laugh. Your link is actually related to your first sentence: version 2 is coming out because he's suckered as many as he can get with version 1.

    The statements from your link are interesting:

    Since then, several other tests have confirmed that the drive works and NASA’s findings were sound. Even better, the tests revealed not only that the EM drive can produce thrust, but it can churn out a lot of it, having the potential to power an entire spacecraft.

    Those are, charitably, misleading, or outright wrong. Churn a lot of thrust? There isn't enough to convince a reasonable person that they are over the noise limit. If real propulsion scientists and engineers can measure thrust, not the C-team at "Eagleworks", but the guys who do it for real, then we can start talking about this as something interesting. Right now it is cold fusion level of science., except that cold fusion at least has a physical basis for it.

    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday October 17 2016, @10:19PM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday October 17 2016, @10:19PM (#415445) Journal

      Just look at the paper when it comes out in December.

      I think some of the findings of the December paper leaked out, but I will wait until its actual release to care. The paper could be revised by then.

      The quoted portion is just bad reporting. The original source for the 2.0 article is IB Times UK [ibtimes.co.uk] (and the patent application). Unfortunately, we have to take Roger Shawyer's word for it that governments are actually (still) interested in emdrive. He appears to have "suckered" in a legit company at least:

      However, he has confirmed that the company he is working with is none other than Gilo Industries Group, the inventors of the personal aviation paramotor vehicle Parajet Skycar, which famously flew TV survivalist Bear Grylls close to Mount Everest in 2007 and is now being developed as an all-terrain flying car. "Gilo Cardozo approached me. I confirm that we are in a joint venture. Universal Propulsion is the name of the joint venture and it's located in Dorset," said Shawyer.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday October 18 2016, @03:05PM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 18 2016, @03:05PM (#415694) Journal
        Currently, there's no evidence that the EM drive is anything other than inefficient light propulsion [sciencealert.com]. In which case, a series of fluorescent tubes would probably be more efficient propulsion.
    • (Score: 2) by jimtheowl on Tuesday October 18 2016, @02:00AM

      by jimtheowl (5929) on Tuesday October 18 2016, @02:00AM (#415496)
      “The greatest fools are ofttimes more clever than the men who laugh at them.” ― George R.R. Martin, A Storm of Swords
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 18 2016, @04:40PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 18 2016, @04:40PM (#415732)

        "They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown." -- Carl Sagan, Broca's Brain