Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard
A legal challenge against the British government's secret surveillance activities has won in court, with the Investigatory Powers Tribunal judging the collection of bulk personal data—conducted by GCHQ and MI5 between 1998 and 2015—to have been illegal.
Responding to a claim brought by Privacy International, the 70-page judgment handed down this morning [PDF] found that the spooks' surveillance activities had been taking place without adequate safeguards or supervision for over a decade; and as such were in breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Due to litigation brought by the charity, the Tribunal ruled that there was not adequate oversight of the bulk communications data system by which GCHQ and MI5 secretly collected data from public electronic communications networks (PECNs) through secret directions given under section 94 of the Telecommunications Act 1984, until after July 2015.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 18 2016, @03:13AM
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 18 2016, @04:14AM
Depends 100% which side of the law you are on. Even worse, it then depends on which run of the ladder you are on, no matter which side it is.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Kilo110 on Tuesday October 18 2016, @05:04AM
Government will never punish itself.
That would be like asking a child to voluntarily decide to take a time out.
(Score: 3, Informative) by butthurt on Tuesday October 18 2016, @03:55PM
> Government will never punish itself.
It's happened on three occasions:
Terror suspects who were placed under virtual house arrest by the Government may claim thousands of pounds in compensation from the taxpayer.
The High Court ruled yesterday that two alleged fanatics given control orders by the Home Office had been denied their human right to a fair trial.
The men may now lodge compensation claims under Labour's Human Rights Act. This is in addition to legal fees running to hundreds of thousands of pounds.
-- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1244145/Terror-suspects-set-payout-winning-landmark-human-rights-ruling-control-orders.html [dailymail.co.uk]
The Home Office has been ordered to pay £13,451 to an Iranian sex offender held in immigration detention too long.
European Court of Human Rights judges said UK authorities were far too slack in trying to deport the man after he completed his sentence for indecent assault.
-- https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1198409/european-court-orders-home-office-to-pay-14k-compensation-to-iranian-sex-offender-for-taking-too-long-to-deport-him/ [thesun.co.uk]
The Home Office has been ordered by the high court to pay compensation to four torture survivors who were unlawfully held in British immigration detention centres.
-- https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/may/21/torture-victims-win-case-uk-detention [theguardian.com]
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Anal Pumpernickel on Tuesday October 18 2016, @06:49PM
So taxpayers foot the bill. Where is the prison time for the government thugs who violated people's rights?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 18 2016, @10:24PM
Because it wasn't a criminal offense. Breaking the law doesn't necessarily make you a criminal, it depends on the specific law in question.
But don't let facts get in the way of a good rant.
(Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Tuesday October 18 2016, @10:40PM
The topic was about how the government will never punish itself. You pointing out that their actions were not a criminal offense is a good example of this, as blatantly violating people's rights on a massive scale should be a criminal offense. There is almost never significant repercussions for these scumbags.