Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday October 17 2016, @10:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the so-now-they've-made-it-legal dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

A legal challenge against the British government's secret surveillance activities has won in court, with the Investigatory Powers Tribunal judging the collection of bulk personal data—conducted by GCHQ and MI5 between 1998 and 2015—to have been illegal.

Responding to a claim brought by Privacy International, the 70-page judgment handed down this morning [PDF] found that the spooks' surveillance activities had been taking place without adequate safeguards or supervision for over a decade; and as such were in breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Due to litigation brought by the charity, the Tribunal ruled that there was not adequate oversight of the bulk communications data system by which GCHQ and MI5 secretly collected data from public electronic communications networks (PECNs) through secret directions given under section 94 of the Telecommunications Act 1984, until after July 2015.

Source: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/10/17/court_finds_gchq_and_mi5_engaged_in_illegal_bulk_data_collection/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by butthurt on Tuesday October 18 2016, @03:55PM

    by butthurt (6141) on Tuesday October 18 2016, @03:55PM (#415713) Journal

    > Government will never punish itself.

    It's happened on three occasions:

    Terror suspects who were placed under virtual house arrest by the Government may claim thousands of pounds in compensation from the taxpayer.

    The High Court ruled yesterday that two alleged fanatics given control orders by the Home Office had been denied their human right to a fair trial.

    The men may now lodge compensation claims under Labour's Human Rights Act. This is in addition to legal fees running to hundreds of thousands of pounds.

    -- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1244145/Terror-suspects-set-payout-winning-landmark-human-rights-ruling-control-orders.html [dailymail.co.uk]

    The Home Office has been ordered to pay £13,451 to an Iranian sex offender held in immigration detention too long.

    European Court of Human Rights judges said UK authorities were far too slack in trying to deport the man after he completed his sentence for indecent assault.

    -- https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1198409/european-court-orders-home-office-to-pay-14k-compensation-to-iranian-sex-offender-for-taking-too-long-to-deport-him/ [thesun.co.uk]

    The Home Office has been ordered by the high court to pay compensation to four torture survivors who were unlawfully held in British immigration detention centres.

    -- https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/may/21/torture-victims-win-case-uk-detention [theguardian.com]

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Anal Pumpernickel on Tuesday October 18 2016, @06:49PM

    by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Tuesday October 18 2016, @06:49PM (#415796)

    So taxpayers foot the bill. Where is the prison time for the government thugs who violated people's rights?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 18 2016, @10:24PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 18 2016, @10:24PM (#415885)

      Because it wasn't a criminal offense. Breaking the law doesn't necessarily make you a criminal, it depends on the specific law in question.
      But don't let facts get in the way of a good rant.

      • (Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Tuesday October 18 2016, @10:40PM

        by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Tuesday October 18 2016, @10:40PM (#415890)

        The topic was about how the government will never punish itself. You pointing out that their actions were not a criminal offense is a good example of this, as blatantly violating people's rights on a massive scale should be a criminal offense. There is almost never significant repercussions for these scumbags.