Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday October 18 2016, @11:05AM   Printer-friendly
from the 30-days-of-mourning dept.

You might have to wait days or even a week to get sex service in Bangkok, Thailand, following the death of the monarch:

On an ordinary Saturday night, the Soi Cowboy red-light district in Bangkok is ablaze with neon lights as skimpily clad women in go-go boots chat up tourists and twirl seductively around poles.

But the decadent flesh parade came to an abrupt halt Thursday when soldiers marched in and shut the dance bars down. It was a gesture of respect for the country's long-ruling monarch, King Bhumibol Adulyadej, who died Thursday afternoon after a long illness and 70 years on the throne. Soon, word came down from the country's prime minister and head of its military: Thailand would be in mourning for a year, flags would be at half-staff and "joyful events" should be avoided for 30 days.

Although the government made clear that visitors should continue their travel plans as normal — as long as they tried to dress and act respectfully — bars and restaurants have since been closed, loud music avoided and alcohol sometimes difficult to come by. All of this has put a damper on one of the world's most popular party spots. About 30 million visitors came to Thailand last year, a number that is expected to reach a record high this year because of an influx from China. Tourism contributed $81 billion to the country's gross domestic product in 2015, nearly 21 percent, according to the World Travel and Tourism Council.

Thailand's military government named 96-year-old Prem Tinsulanonda as king regent:

He came up through the ranks of the powerful military and became prime minister in 1980, staying at the helm for eight years, while guiding the country through economic problems and a series of military challenges, including two coup attempts. But Prem had been accused by supporters of former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra of instigating the coup that removed the populist leader in 2006.

On Thursday, the government unexpectedly announced that Bhumibol's heir apparent, Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn, did not want to be immediately named king to give the nation time to mourn his father's death. Al Jazeera's Harry Fawcett, reporting from Bangkok, said there is no deadline set for the succession to take place.

[Continues...]

The heir apparent's lifestyle and multiple divorces have soured his public image:

The lavish European lifestyle of the son, Crown Prince Vajiralongkorn, and his tastes for airplanes, fast cars, women and the high life have caused great anxiety in the kingdom for decades. Now he is on the cusp of ascending the throne. The death of the beloved King Bhumibol Adulyadej on Thursday has set in motion a succession that many Thais say they wish they could avoid. King Bhumibol had been a unifying figure in a country that is torn by deep divisions of class and politics and is currently ruled by a military junta. The issue is whether the prince, seen by many Thais as lacking the deep public devotion that his father enjoyed, can hold the country together.

The prince's ascension also raises questions about the future of the monarchy, as a less-beloved king could give strength to a republican movement that has gained a foothold in recent years. Among the issues at stake is control over one of the world's great royal fortunes, an estimated $31 billion in real estate holdings alone. Succession may force the consideration of an unresolved and rarely discussed question of whether those assets and others are the property of the royal family or of the Thai public.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Tuesday October 18 2016, @08:42PM

    by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Tuesday October 18 2016, @08:42PM (#415840)

    The nearest I can think of was the death of princess Diana, except a dozen times worse.

    I was called "unfeeling" and "mean" when I sneered at my sister-in-law for crying at the death of Diana.
    I pointed out that not only had the SIL never met Diana, she had never even visited the UK.
    Apparently she felt like "she had lost her best friend".
    That's exactly how I felt when I saw footage of Thai people crying over the death of their King.
    Easily manipulated fools.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Kell on Tuesday October 18 2016, @11:17PM

    by Kell (292) on Tuesday October 18 2016, @11:17PM (#415904)

    I can't comment on your sister, but the Thai people had good reasons (beside a long culture of royalty-worship) to revere their king. Bumibol had a long reign, primarily marked by peace and stability, including active intercession to minimise the damage caused by Japanese expansionism in the second world war. He was not a stranger to the Thai people and was quite an exception in inviting public criticism of himself and the royalty in general (which is rare - many Thais are more zealous about lese mageste than he is). Many English people love QEII because she was a good figurehead and did much for her country; so too with Bumibol, but with stronger cultural reverence. You can say they're easily manipulated fools, but then you could say that about Americans who think George Washington was a saint, or pretty much any people with a folk hero. It's human nature to magnify people; Bumibol, at least, was actually a good guy.

    --
    Scientists ask questions. Engineers solve problems.
    • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Wednesday October 19 2016, @12:08AM

      by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Wednesday October 19 2016, @12:08AM (#415930)

      I don't mean to come down too hard on the Thai people, who in my limited experience are a great bunch, but they've been sold a pup with their royal family.

      primarily marked by peace and stability

      Apart from ensuring the military took over repeatedly if the people voted the wrong way.

      was quite an exception in inviting public criticism of himself and the royalty in general

      Lèse majesté in Thailand [wikipedia.org] is punished extremely harshly. If the King was against it, he would have stopped it.

      Bumibol, at least, was actually a good guy

      Who has managed to amass a $36 billion fortune. From where? Also who murdered his older brother [wikipedia.org], enabling him to come to power?
      Don't ask that question in Thailand, you'll be off to jail.

      • (Score: 2) by Kell on Wednesday October 19 2016, @01:20AM

        by Kell (292) on Wednesday October 19 2016, @01:20AM (#415949)

        Apart from ensuring the military took over repeatedly if the people voted the wrong way.

        Except that that's not true at all; that's an internal political thing and nothing to do with the king.

        Lèse majesté in Thailand is punished extremely harshly. If the King was against it, he would have stopped it.

        And he's tried - he repeatedly pardoned people who were imprisoned for it, because he didn't agree with the law. But he chose not to set the laws for people; he let them decide their own laws.

        Who has managed to amass a $36 billion fortune. From where? Also who murdered his older brother, enabling him to come to power?

        And the queen of England is wealthy too, surprise surprise. And yes, I've heard that old saw before - nobody takes it seriously for a reason. The people who were charged with his assassination were luckless pages who were scapegoated because it was easier to accept that the king had been killed, rather than that the king had accidentally shot himself. There was foul play, but not what you're insinuating.

        --
        Scientists ask questions. Engineers solve problems.
        • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Wednesday October 19 2016, @02:17AM

          by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Wednesday October 19 2016, @02:17AM (#415961)

          Here's a list of people sent to prison for the act of criticising the King of Thailand: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A8se_majest%C3%A9_in_Thailand#Acts_punished [wikipedia.org]

          I count two who received a pardon from the King.

          he chose not to set the laws for people; he let them decide their own laws.

          What people are these? The military runs Thailand, and has done since before World War II.

          • (Score: 2) by Kell on Wednesday October 19 2016, @03:00AM

            by Kell (292) on Wednesday October 19 2016, @03:00AM (#415977)

            Yes, some people have been sent to prison - and the vast majority served a token sentence and were released, or were pardoned by the king. Ironically, I agree with you that the military juntas have occasionally used lese majeste to victimise political rivals and they are the ones who typically languish in prison for any period of time - but it's unusual. The military does not control Thai politics except in a few brief periods, then things go back to normal. Have you lived in Thailand? It's not a perfect place, but it's not what I think you imagine it is, either.

            --
            Scientists ask questions. Engineers solve problems.