Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

The Mathematics of the American Justice System

posted by martyb on Tuesday October 18 2016, @12:42PM   Printer-friendly
from the does-not-add-up dept.

Kromagv0 writes:

The BBC is reporting on the Compas assessment, Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions. This tool is used by a number of agencies to assess if someone is likely to commit additional crimes and the resulting score is used in determining bail, sentencing, or determining parole. The article points out that while the questions on the assessment do not include race the resulting score may be correlated with race but this is disputed by the software's creators. The assessment scores someone on a 10 point scale but the algorithm used to determine someone's score is kept secret. Because of this defendants are unable to effectively dispute that the score is incorrect.

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Mathematics of the American Justice System | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 62 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 2) by jcross on Tuesday October 18 2016, @08:38PM

    by jcross (4009) on Tuesday October 18 2016, @08:38PM (#415835)

    But what if we interpret the arrest/sentencing/incarceration as depriving a citizen of liberty, and bail/clemency/parole as granting it? Looked at this way, due process is observed for the first set of actions, and Compas scores are only used for the second set, where due process is technically not required. Of course this is a dodge, like constant deep discounts off the "rack rate" of a hotel room, but at face value I don't see how it's inconsistent with the part of the Fifth amendment you've quoted.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   2  

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday October 18 2016, @08:46PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 18 2016, @08:46PM (#415844) Journal

    But what if we interpret the arrest/sentencing/incarceration as depriving a citizen of liberty, and bail/clemency/parole as granting it?

    Or we could look at it as culling the weak and stupid from society. Mealy mouthed or self-serving rationalizations are nothing new. It's still a violation of the Fifth Amendment, but a violation that can be conveniently ignored, if you're no longer going by rule of law.

    Of course this is a dodge

    Agreed.

    but at face value I don't see how it's inconsistent with the part of the Fifth amendment you've quoted.

    Anything is arguable. Anything can be deemed consistent even when it's not.