Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday October 18 2016, @10:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the doing-it-with-mirrors dept.

Hearings on the potential construction of the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT), opposed by native and environmental activists, begin on October 18th:

If you are going to spend more than a billion dollars building one of the world's biggest telescopes, you'll want to put it in a place with the best possible view of the stars. But in the case of the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT), an instrument that promises unprecedented images of everything from the most distant galaxies to nearby exoplanets, builders may have to settle for second best.

Next week, the fierce legal and cultural battle that has engulfed efforts to build the TMT on Mauna Kea, a 4207-meter-high peak in Hawaii, will reignite as state officials open a pivotal hearing on whether to allow construction. The peak is rated as the best observing site in the Northern Hemisphere, but for Native Hawaiians it is sacred land, and many residents oppose the project. "The risk [to the project] is by no means small," says project manager Gary Sanders of the TMT International Observatory in Pasadena, California, and "the cost of delay is significant." So the project is also hedging its bets by considering alternative sites.

There is a wealth of information available on the Thirty-Meter Telescope web site.

Previously:
Protests Temporarily Halt Thirty-Meter Telescope's Construction in Hawaii
Hawaiian Court Revokes Permit for Construction of Thirty-Meter-Telescope


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday October 19 2016, @01:47PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday October 19 2016, @01:47PM (#416123) Journal

    If only you would so completely not care that you would stop running your mouth like your opinion was grounded in anything more than selfish ignorance.

    I notice there have supposedly been several defenders of the Hawaiian side in this conversation. And yet not one word of why they're here. I'd just like a simple explanation of what supposedly is going on beyond the superficial story. It remains that this telescope looks pretty important to me, but it would work almost as well in a few other locations. So it's not the end of the world if it has to be built somewhere else, or even not at all. Still looks a hell of a lot more important than anything else going on in this story.

    And yes, "don't care" remains my default position, if we're just going to continue to play rhetorical games.