Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Wednesday October 19 2016, @06:43AM   Printer-friendly
from the nice-dough,-if-you-can-get-it dept.

Kasia Tarczynska reports via Common Dreams:

Tech giants are successfully pressuring cash-strapped states and municipalities to provide massive subsidies to support their data centers, but the data centers create few permanent jobs for local workers.

Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, and Facebook, America's most well-known brands and most prosperous firms, are demanding that states and localities provide them ever-larger economic development subsidies to support their data centers. Last year these five tech giants reported nearly $120 billion in pre-tax profits, and yet they told states and localities they needed financial help to build new data centers, structures essential to their business operations. Their efforts resulted in more than $2 billion in public support to build 11 new data centers. The facilities would create 1,174 long-term jobs, amounting to an enormous per-job subsidy of $1.95 million, according to Money Lost to the Cloud ,[PDF] a new report from Good Jobs First, which I authored.

Data centers have enormous footprints. Apple's one in Maiden, NC has 500,000 feet of floor space, enough to fit nine football fields inside--and it is expensive, costing more than $1 billion, most of it for the endless racks of expensive servers and the powerful air conditioning required to keep the heat-spewing electronics cool. But despite this cost, the data center will employ fewer than 50 permanent workers, a subsidy of $6.4 million per employee, the most of any deal in our survey.

[...] Offering seven-figure-per-[job] subsidies is a losing proposition for taxpayers and communities. Utah officials realized this when they backed out of a recent $260 million 20-year data center subsidy deal with Facebook. They understand there were other opportunities for the industrial land where the project would be located, opportunities that would result in more jobs for local residents.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by BsAtHome on Wednesday October 19 2016, @07:35AM

    by BsAtHome (889) on Wednesday October 19 2016, @07:35AM (#416057)

    But, but, the roomba needs money to operate. It is essential to subsidize us, so that we may employ more roombas. Think of all the robots^H^H^H^H^H^Hpeople who build the roombas. It creates a positive effect to employ more people, promise!

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by nitehawk214 on Wednesday October 19 2016, @02:42PM

    by nitehawk214 (1304) on Wednesday October 19 2016, @02:42PM (#416150)

    Robots building robots? How perverse.

    --
    "Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 19 2016, @07:41PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 19 2016, @07:41PM (#416306)

      Robots building robots. Robots maintaining robots. What for? Why, so robot consumers can buy the stuff that the robots made by the other robots make!

    • (Score: 2) by J053 on Wednesday October 19 2016, @09:46PM

      by J053 (3532) <{dakine} {at} {shangri-la.cx}> on Wednesday October 19 2016, @09:46PM (#416362) Homepage
      It's robots all the way down.