Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday October 20 2016, @11:08AM   Printer-friendly
from the where's-a-muckraker-when-you-need-one? dept.

Okay, so, I wasn't going to submit these here because I've really had quite enough of politics for the year but it seems the mainstream media are having an absolute blackout on anything critical of Hillary, to the point of CNN has both coincidentally lost a sitting congressman's satellite feed immediately after mentioning wikileaks and tried to tell their viewers that even reading the wikileaks emails is illegal.

These two videos by Project Veritas Action, apparently with more to come, are the result of a year or so of actual investigative journalism and deserve coverage somewhere though. I don't personally care at all if you like Hillary or not but it's always better to know the truth than to stick your head in the sand, so here they are.

The first part in the series is titled Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies. It basically shows precisely what it says it does. Hidden cameras capture Scott Foval of Americans United for Change not so much admitting as bragging that they have operatives in numerous major cities that are actually trained in how best to incite violence at Trump rallies.

The second part of the series is again aptly titled Mass Voter Fraud. In this video Scott Foval is again captured going into minute detail on how not only go commit mass voter fraud but how to get away with it.

Scott Foval and Robert Creamer (also in the videos) are currently unemployed as a result of these videos. Whether Mrs. Clinton should be as well, that's for you to decide.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Thursday October 20 2016, @01:38PM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Thursday October 20 2016, @01:38PM (#416639) Journal

    For example, of COURSE he has done and said "inappropriate" things against women. Trump is an over-sized testosterone dripping baboon, who like other popular figures has been around long enough to have lived in a time when that wasn't considered the worst thing ever. The only thing "surprising" is that they didn't dig up more of that at the start before he became an official candidate... Oh, I wonder why that was?

    When that story first came out, I thought that one would sting Trump. It has. But my wife and I have been living in a self-imposed media blackout through this election so I haven't followed anything closely. Then a couple weeks later it was that I heard he said those things on a Howard Stern show. Has anyone ever said anything appropriate or respectful about women on a Howard Stern show? Raunchy frat-boy antics is the whole point of that show, so of course Trump would have said things like that in that context. Does that make what he said (or did) OK? No, but for me it took all the shock value out of what he said.

    If it came out that Hillary gave an interview to an underground dyke 'zine wherein she described doing inappropriate things with women, it would make sense because that's the kind of thing that dyke 'zines talk about.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Thursday October 20 2016, @02:42PM

    by GreatAuntAnesthesia (3275) on Thursday October 20 2016, @02:42PM (#416692) Journal

    I mean come on, who goes to a baby chimp-eating party and then DOESN'T eat baby chimps?

    So that makes it OK.