SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
[...] In instituting these four forms of privacy—privacy within team boundaries, privacy limits on employee data, privacy in decision-making, and privacy about time—the organizations Bernstein studied refused the temptation to observe (or try to observe) everything. That refusal did not cost them profits or effectiveness. Instead, respect for privacy enhanced their success.
[...] That suggests that privacy's defenders should not concede that total surveillance is safest (or most efficient or most profitable), before going on to say that it would be creepy to have to fly naked. That's important in a society where monitoring technology is ever cheaper and ever more powerful, and the notion is spreading that surveillance, and the data it generates, can solve any problem. Privacy, so often depicted as the enemy of efficiency in public life, can be its friend.
[Discussion]: Privacy Makes Workers More Productive
[Source]: Want People to Behave Better? Give Them More Privacy
[Related]: Duet Ex Machina
(Score: 2) by Reziac on Sunday October 23 2016, @06:02AM
My former bank went from traditional counters-and-tellers to this big open ring affair. Everyone hated it, and it somehow managed to be a lot slower, too. The problem seemed to be that it was both directionless for the customers (they soon resorted to having tellers go fetch the next customer from the line) and stressful for the tellers (who were now completely exposed, in a neighborhood with considerable crime) despite being rigged up so they had no access to cash.
So, yeah. Fucking dumb fads.
And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.