Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday October 23 2016, @04:56PM   Printer-friendly
from the head-scratching dept.

I just happened to see this story appear in our #rss-bot feed. How to Solve the World's Hardest Logic Puzzle. Given that this is the weekend, I thought it might make for an interesting challenge and discussion.

To set the stage for the puzzle, the author provides some background on Raymond Smullyan, the puzzle's composer:

While a doctoral student at Princeton University in 1957, studying under a founder of theoretical computer science, Raymond Smullyan would occasionally visit New York City. On one of these visits, he met a "very charming lady musician" and, on their first date, Smullyan, an incorrigible flirt, proceeded very logically—and sneakily.

"Would you please do me a favor?" he asked her. "I am to make a statement. If the statement is true, would you give me your autograph?"

Content to play along, she replied, "I don't see why not."

"If the statement is false," he went on, "you don't give me your autograph."

"Alright ..."

His statement was: "You'll give me neither your autograph nor a kiss."

It takes a moment, but the cleverness of Smullyan's ploy eventually becomes clear.

A truthful statement gets him her autograph, as they agreed. But Smullyan's statement, supposing it's true, leads to contradiction: It rules out giving an autograph. That makes Smullyan's statement false. And if Smullyan's statement is false, then the charming lady musician will give him either an autograph or a kiss. Now you see the trap: She has already agreed not to reward a false statement with an autograph.

With logic, Smullyan turned a false statement into a kiss. (And into a beautiful romance: The two would eventually marry.)

Clever! But enough with the setup — What's the puzzle?

The Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever goes like this:

Three gods A, B, and C are called, in some order, True, False, and Random. True always speaks truly, False always speaks falsely, but whether Random speaks truly or falsely is a completely random matter. Your task is to determine the identities of A, B, and C by asking three yes-no questions; each question must be put to exactly one god. The gods understand English, but will answer all questions in their own language, in which the words for "yes" and "no" are "da" and "ja," in some order. You do not know which word means which.

The story's author is, himself, a bit of a puzzle-poser. The story tells how to solve the puzzle, but does not actually provide the solution. Are there any Soylentils up to the challenge?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by cubancigar11 on Monday October 24 2016, @10:36AM

    by cubancigar11 (330) on Monday October 24 2016, @10:36AM (#418093) Homepage Journal

    "I will vote for a fascist criminal who bribed her way out of judiciary because the other guy is celebrity who gets more sex than me." - edIII (791)

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 24 2016, @12:26PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 24 2016, @12:26PM (#418115)

    Yeah, because there are only two candidates you can vote for. Oh, wait …

    • (Score: 2) by cubancigar11 on Monday October 24 2016, @02:30PM

      by cubancigar11 (330) on Monday October 24 2016, @02:30PM (#418151) Homepage Journal

      Oh I am sorry, I thought this more than yet another 'lets bash a successful man who isn't me' thread.

      • (Score: 2) by edIII on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:27AM

        by edIII (791) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:27AM (#418357)

        He isn't successful, but a con man. We don't refer to criminals as successful.

        Interesting, that despite his monstrous character flaws (pun intended), that you think objections must simply be due to jealousy.

        I can see the level of intelligence you possess, and no, I will no be joining you in the kiddie pool to play around :)

        --
        Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
  • (Score: 2) by edIII on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:24AM

    by edIII (791) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:24AM (#418356)

    I will fully admit he gets WAY more non consensual sex involving assault then I do, Sure :D

    Other than that, you made no substantive points whatsoever and effectively were nothing more than a monkey flinging poo around.

    Bad Monkey!

    Lol

    --
    Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.