Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 14 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Monday October 24 2016, @04:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the this-took-a-study-to-figure-out? dept.
An Anonymous Coward [not surprising is it?] sent us the following:

Not everyone who strives to navigate the internet without being tracked is up to no good. This is the underlying premise of a qualitative study led by a trio of Drexel University researchers, who set out to gather the stories of people working on collaborative projects online — like editing Wikipedia — and are concerned about their privacy and taking steps to protect it.

The study, entitled "Privacy, Anonymity, and Perceived Risk in Open Collaboration: A Study of Tor Users and Wikipedians," which was published in advance of its presentation at the Association of Computing Machinery (ACM) Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing in February, offers a rare look into why some people turn to IP obfuscation tools, such as the onion router, to keep a low profile and how they experience the internet as a result.

The study's central finding is that perceived threats from other individuals, groups of people and governments are substantial enough to force users below the radar in order to protect their reputation, themselves, and their families.

"Wikipedia editors are volunteers who are trying to build a comprehensive free information resource for everyone on the planet. Tor users are often not seen in those positive ways. But these two organizations are actually committed to the same things — a free global exchange of information with everyone able to participate," said Andrea Forte, PhD , an associate professor in Drexel's College of Computing & Informatics and lead author of the study.

Press Release


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 24 2016, @06:11PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 24 2016, @06:11PM (#418231)

    And non-anonymity breeds repression.

    This is what people do not understand. It 100% breeds it. One of my family members is a lawyer. They can in under 15-20 mins of work dig up a scary amount of data on you. With a few warrants they can get even more.

    With a bit of a search engine you can find a decent amount on most people. My 'public' personal is rather tame. I like to keep my job.

  • (Score: 2) by jasassin on Tuesday October 25 2016, @11:48PM

    by jasassin (3566) <jasassin@gmail.com> on Tuesday October 25 2016, @11:48PM (#418768) Homepage Journal

    How is this scary amount of information that some lawyer digs up repression? If I was convicted of a violent crime, and I can't get a concealed permit is that repression? No. So how would this scay data (shit in public records) be considered repression? I don't understand where you are coming from. Please elaborate.

    --
    jasassin@gmail.com GPG Key ID: 0xE6462C68A9A3DB5A