Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday October 24 2016, @09:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the open-is-better dept.

Quartz reports

Seven Rhode Island universities, including Brown and Rhode Island College, will move to open-license textbooks [1] in a bid to save students $5 million over the next five years, the governor announced [September 27].

The initiative is meant to put a dent in the exorbitant cost of college and, more specifically, college textbooks. Mark Perry, a professor of economics and finance at the University of Michigan Flint, and a writer at the American Enterprise Institute, estimated last year [Cloudflare protected] that college textbook prices rose 945% between 1978 and 2014, compared to an overall inflation rate of 262% and a 604% rise in the cost of medical care.

That is not the result of a general trend of higher costs in publishing, he notes: the consumer price index for recreational books has been falling relative to overall inflation since 1998.

[...] Open textbooks are defined as "faculty-written, peer-reviewed textbooks that are published under an open license--meaning that they are available free online, they are free to download, and print copies are available at $10-40, or approximately the cost of printing", according to a report by the Student Public Interest Research Groups (PIRGs) (pdf). They are part of the move toward Open Educational Resources, which has roots in the open-source software movement, it says.

Open licenses allow for content to be shared, unlike traditional textbooks which limit the use of their materials. [Richard Culatta, the chief innovation officer for Rhode Island] remembers teaching and replacing a section of a textbook with more relevant information for his class, only to be informed that he was infringing on international copyright law.

[1] A very bloated (webfonts) all-script-driven page.

Note: If you are thinking of using "begs the question" in the same way the state official did, that is a bad idea.

Our previous discussions of student materials and adoption of openness.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by DannyB on Monday October 24 2016, @09:24PM

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 24 2016, @09:24PM (#418289) Journal

    Doesn't Rhode Island realize that this will cost desperately poor textbook publishers $5 million per year in sales? Therefore it must, somehow, be bad for the economy, in some undefinable way. Just like if I don't break the main street store owner's front glass window is bad for the economy because the glass maker won't realize the profits of installing the replacement.

    Each lost sail is like another attack on expensive textbooks.

    --
    To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Funny=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 24 2016, @09:54PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 24 2016, @09:54PM (#418299)

    Each lost sail is like another attack on expensive textbooks.

    Maybe I should cry for help
    Maybe I should kill myself
    Blame it on my ADD baby

    SAIL!

    • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Monday October 24 2016, @10:30PM

      by aristarchus (2645) on Monday October 24 2016, @10:30PM (#418307) Journal

      Sale away, sale away, sale away!

      • (Score: 2) by fido_dogstoyevsky on Tuesday October 25 2016, @03:49AM

        by fido_dogstoyevsky (131) <{axehandle} {at} {gmail.com}> on Tuesday October 25 2016, @03:49AM (#418390)

        Sale away, sale away, sale away!

        Red sales in the sunset
        Way out on the sea...

        --
        It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @05:16AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @05:16AM (#418405)

          Visa and MasterCard accepted!

          • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Tuesday October 25 2016, @06:06AM

            by aristarchus (2645) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @06:06AM (#418411) Journal

            Truely, our abuse of a fellow Soylentil who only made a simple homophobic typo has already been sufficient. Perhaps it is time to just let it go, to sail away on the azure sea propelled by the winds of the clouds. . . Wait, did you say "Azure"? Batten down the hatches! All crew on deck! Man the rigging! (yes, that is terribly sexist, but no immediate substitute comes to mind) We are in for nasty weather!

            And, of course, the purpose of textbooks is to give us practice so we do not look like illiterate buffons or jmorris when we post something to SoylentNews. Standards, peoples! That is what makes Free Software! Open and accessible standards, open to all, like, you know, spelling.

            [For the less literate among us: Homophone is the proper word: sounding the same. Fear of words that sound the same would be "homophoniphobia". I would hate to be the person who catches that! Just saying. ]

            • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Tuesday October 25 2016, @01:41PM

              by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 25 2016, @01:41PM (#418530) Journal

              I am not offended by anything I have read here. I am never offended by homophobic remarks directed my way. But did I miss a homophobic typo? Did I make one? Or did someone else make one? Whatever it may be, I seem to be unaware of what it is.

              Lost sails are due to piracy!

              --
              To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
  • (Score: 2) by e_armadillo on Monday October 24 2016, @10:45PM

    by e_armadillo (3695) on Monday October 24 2016, @10:45PM (#418311)

    Obviously, they didn't read "Economics in One Lesson".

    However, I'm not sure the Baker's window analogy applies here. Nothing is destroyed, other than the publisher's revenue, and that isn't destroyed. It is merely diverted to other areas of the economy. i.e. instead of spending that $5M on textbooks, the students will spend that money on other things like pizza, beer, new clothes, music, etc. On the other hand, the change isn't good for authors that would contribute to said texts, discouraging some from writing texts since free doesn't pay their rent. I'd say more analysis would have to be made to understand if the economy as a whole is better or worse off in this case.

    --
    "How are we gonna get out of here?" ... "We'll dig our way out!" ... "No, no, dig UP stupid!"
    • (Score: 5, Insightful) by lentilla on Tuesday October 25 2016, @12:22AM

      by lentilla (1770) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @12:22AM (#418326)

      instead of spending that $5M on textbooks, the students will spend that money on other things like pizza, beer, new clothes, music, etc.

      A more likely result:

      • students can afford more books, so they actually purchase the books they need - rather than making pragmatic decisions about which ones to skip buying.
      • students reduce the amount of time they work because they now don't absolutely need that money to purchase books.
      • instead, they spend their time either studying - or even sleeping, helping them be alert during the following days' lectures.
      • a reduction in financial stress means the students can concentrate on learning and social development, rather than expending effort inventing creative permutations on rice-and-beans, and being able to afford the bus fare to campus.

      Students will still spend money on pizza, beer and clothes - it's just that the putative $500 saved on books this semester is unlikely to equate to $500 sales in other stores. Students are more likely to adjust their income accordingly.

      From my perspective, the best part about this initiative is that that the world will be more "just". We get students; the intellectual cream of the crop fresh out of school; and the first thing we tell them is that have to work mindless jobs (diverting time from doing what they should be doing) in order to buy textbooks. Textbooks that are exactly the same as last year's versions except that the pages have been renumbered. It's a pretty insulting slap in the face after everything we have taught them at school about playing fair.

      • (Score: 2) by e_armadillo on Tuesday October 25 2016, @12:30AM

        by e_armadillo (3695) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @12:30AM (#418328)

        Absolutely agree.

        --
        "How are we gonna get out of here?" ... "We'll dig our way out!" ... "No, no, dig UP stupid!"
        • (Score: 3, Interesting) by bzipitidoo on Tuesday October 25 2016, @06:05PM

          by bzipitidoo (4388) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @06:05PM (#418646) Journal

          Or, university administrators raise tuition by about the amount that textbook costs dropped. Their pay packages rise accordingly.

          I like the move to open textbooks. But I fear that unless we watch very carefully, the savings will be appropriated by others and students won't benefit. Greed is the problem of these times.

          • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Tuesday October 25 2016, @06:10PM

            by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 25 2016, @06:10PM (#418653) Journal

            We need a new moderation, "Sigh". I moderated this interesting, but that's not quite right, and neither is insightful. The real mod should mean something like "unfortunately probable, sigh".

            --
            Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @12:54AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @12:54AM (#418334)

        We get students; the intellectual cream of the crop fresh out of school

        What? That doesn't even remotely describe 99% of the people in universities and colleges (or people in general). Only in a delusional paper-worshiping society could this possibly be seen as true.

        • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:18PM

          by Thexalon (636) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:18PM (#418552)

          What? That doesn't even remotely describe 99% of the people in universities and colleges

          Some sort of approximation of the top half of people graduating high school then. I've spent time working in academia, and you can be absolutely sure that good colleges are looking for the smartest people they can get their grubby paws on. I'm not saying that all smart people manage to go to an Ivy League school, but if you got into Brown odds are you're pretty darn good at academics.

          --
          The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by davester666 on Tuesday October 25 2016, @06:28AM

    by davester666 (155) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @06:28AM (#418417)

    Basically, if you support this, you also support crushing the skulls of puppies with a brick.

  • (Score: 1) by Z-A,z-a,01234 on Tuesday October 25 2016, @07:27AM

    by Z-A,z-a,01234 (5873) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @07:27AM (#418432)

    Why did you moderate the parent Funny? I think it's pretty insightful.

    All research papers should also be available on the internet (author's page maybe) free of charge, including code and data. From the abstract it is not possible to discern if the paper is crap or actually contains some interesting result.