Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday October 25 2016, @01:07AM   Printer-friendly
from the capitalism-rocks! dept.

El Reg reports

A leaked presentation to Samsung executives has provided further insight into the company's damaged internal culture.

The PowerPoint document focuses on strategies to prevent the creation of labor unions at the South Korean company and takes a very aggressive stance, treating employees as enemies, and suggesting "countermeasures", as well as ways to "dominate employees".

It also talks about "punishing" union leaders, isolating "troublesome" employees, and "inducing internal conflicts" as a way of intimidating employees and preventing the creation of unions. The presentation is also dismissive of labor laws and government ministers that have proposed changes to protect employees.

The presentation [PPT] [PDF] is dated 2012, but appears to have been used repeatedly by Samsung executives up until two years ago. It was unearthed by the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), which drew a direct line between the approach demonstrated in the presentation and the recent aborted launch of the Galaxy Note 7 due to exploding batteries.

"Inhumane conditions are rife" at the company, the ITUC reports, noting that Samsung employees are overworked, under-paid, and forced to suffer appalling conditions, including "standing for 11 to 12 hours, verbal and physical abuse, severe age and gender discrimination, and lack of worker safety".

It quotes one worker who claimed that during an intense three-month period in the run-up to the release of a Galaxy tablet she slept only two or three hours a night and had to give up breastfeeding her three-month-old baby as a result.

One [slide] lists examples of employee deaths that have been attributed to overwork. One employee, Kim, killed himself and the presentation notes that he had worked 100 hours of overtime each month for nine months. A widow of a manager is quoted as saying he "died from overwork".


Ed Note: Title changed to more accurately reflect content. 0700UTC

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @01:41AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @01:41AM (#418345)

    And it's all by this spamming douchebag, phoenix, or the submission bot. We all need to step up, or else SN will shrivel away to death, without even a whimper.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Insightful=2, Disagree=1, Total=6
    Extra 'Flamebait' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:02AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:02AM (#418352)

    Um, you forgot to post the reason you think this submission sucks.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by aristarchus on Tuesday October 25 2016, @08:24AM

      by aristarchus (2645) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @08:24AM (#418437) Journal

      forgot to post the reason you think this submission sucks.

      We are dealing with an alt-right here, I fear. Reasoning and thinking are beyond his abilities, I am afraid. But he definitely disagrees, most strongly, for some reason he does not consciously recognize or understand. . . Brietbart!!!

  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:28AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:28AM (#418358)

    I wouldn't worry.

    Every time idiots like gewg or phoenix666 post their pathetic cries for attention get shredded and shat out like bran.

    OK, except for a few morons who believe them, but they're clearly in the minority.

  • (Score: 5, Informative) by Phoenix666 on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:43AM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:43AM (#418364) Journal

    Do step up.

    I submit stories over morning coffee. Takes about 2-3 mins per. I have RSS feeds I scan for stories. When there are a lot I think the SN community will like discussing, I submit them all at once so the editors can bank them against the pipeline going dry. If others submit enough, you don't see many of my submissions. I prefer those times because it's nice to see something on the main page I haven't already seen. When the pipeline dries up, my submissions are there to keep things rolling. These last couple I submitted about a week ago.

    There's an FAQ with story submission guidelines [soylentnews.org]. It can help you if you haven't submitted before. I would add a couple tips that aren't in those guidelines. First, don't spend hours preparing a submission. If you did and it was turned down, you would probably be annoyed and never submit another; if it was accepted and it generated very little discussion, or even negative comments ("You SUCK!!! SN is going to the dogs, I'm leaving and never coming baaaack," etc.) you'll wonder why you wasted your time. On the bright side our kindly editors would probably give you a reason why it was rejected. (Slashdot never did, and they never accepted any of my submissions, which is why I quickly learned not to. In their case, they had a paid staff of editors who did it for you. Soylent is all volunteer.) So an investment of 2-3 minutes, or at least under 5 minutes per submission, is better.

    Second, copy & paste representative excerpts from the story you're linking to rather than summarizing in your own words. Few of us are expert enough or have enough time to sit there and fact-check everything in our written summary. Do it once, thinking you've got a solid handle of, say, database architecture, and getting chopped into a million tiny pieces by database architecture pedants will convince you to let the person getting paid to get it wrong (ie. the journalist) take the lashing.

    Anyway, those are a couple rules of thumb I use that others might find useful. If not, great. TIMTOWTDI [wikia.com].

    I look forward to seeing new submitters filling the pipeline. I'll keep submitting mine, but it would be quite alright to never see another one of them make the editors' cut.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
  • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:43AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25 2016, @02:43AM (#418365)

    And it's all by this spamming douchebag, phoenix, or the submission bot. We all need to step up and stop whining like a little bitch, or else SN will shrivel away to death, without even a whimper.

    There. FTFY.