Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Friday October 28 2016, @01:06PM   Printer-friendly
from the if-it-doesn't-exist-we-would-need-to-create-it dept.

Sterile neutrinos (or inert neutrinos) are hypothetical particles (neutral leptons – neutrinos) that interact only via gravity and do not interact via any of the other fundamental interactions of the Standard Model. The term sterile neutrino is used to distinguish them from the known active neutrinos in the Standard Model, which are charged under the weak interaction.

From the Phys.Org article:

Dr Justin Evans, senior lecturer in particle physics at The University of Manchester, said the elusive 'sterile' neutrino, if proven to exist, has the potential to unlock the great mysteries of our Universe – even potentially explaining why we exist as we do. Researchers believe identifying this new particle would be even more significant than locating the original so-called 'God particle', the Higgs boson.

As part of an international collaboration Dr Evans has been the Physics Coordinator on the MINOS experiment, leading the experiment's physics programme. As well as leading this part of the MINOS collaboration he also coordinated the research combination with another programme called Daya Bay.

        --The MINOS experiment uses an intense beam of muon neutrinos that travels 735 km from the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) in Chicago to the Soudan Underground Laboratory in northern Minnesota. MINOS has made world-leading measurements to study how these neutrinos disappear as they travel between the two detectors.
        --The Daya Bay experiment looks at electron antineutrinos coming from a nuclear power plant in the Guangdong province of China. The Daya Bay project measured, for the first time, one of the parameters governing neutrino oscillations.
...
"The sterile neutrino could explain the puzzle of why the neutrino is so much lighter - by orders of magnitude - than any other massive particle. It could help to explain why the universe contains more matter than antimatter, ie help to explain why we exist as we do. And, if the sterile neutrino is heavy enough, it could even be part of the solution for the dark matter puzzle."

'God Particle' is taken. How about 'Satan Particle?'


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by melikamp on Friday October 28 2016, @01:42PM

    by melikamp (1886) on Friday October 28 2016, @01:42PM (#419826) Journal
    This. And while I got nothing but respect for Higgs (listen to him on the radio, he's like the world's most likeable scientist), and have no desire to diminish his contributions, I don't particularly like the "Higgs" name, which is even less fair than the corresponding Nobel, given the massive number of people who should properly be credited with the discovery. How about "No Spin Particle"?
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @01:55PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @01:55PM (#419832)

    How about "No Spin Particle"?

    That would be "scalar boson". Just like a spin 1 particle is a "vector boson".

    The problem is, we don't know for sure that Higgs is the only scalar boson. If some day it turned out that there are other scalar bosons that are not associated with the Higgs mechanism, the term would get problematic. For example, the inflaton (the inflaton field is supposed to have driven the inflation phase during big bang, and may or may not be identical with the Higgs field) is also assumed to be a scalar boson.

  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Immerman on Friday October 28 2016, @01:56PM

    by Immerman (3985) on Friday October 28 2016, @01:56PM (#419833)

    Yeah, but the Jacob-Marley-Fytrfg-Ksfbh-Hasiugf-Msdvcak-Nadlyjvgf-Walsdgf-Xsdkjf-................. particle just doesn't roll off the tongue as easily, and can you imagine how long the papers would be? Heck, just refer to the particle by name and you've exceeded the 20 page minimum for your undergrad essay.

    So realistically, what are you going to do? Name it for the guy who first theorized it existed? Something random? Or for one of the many people who were mostly looking for *anything* at higher energy levels, with the Higgs just giving them some possible convenient energies to suspect something might exist at?

  • (Score: 4, Funny) by Thexalon on Friday October 28 2016, @02:33PM

    by Thexalon (636) on Friday October 28 2016, @02:33PM (#419854)

    How about "No Spin Particle"?

    Because then people will start calling it the "O'Reilly Particle" after Bill O'Reilly?

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    • (Score: 2, Touché) by Azuma Hazuki on Friday October 28 2016, @04:37PM

      by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Friday October 28 2016, @04:37PM (#419881) Journal

      No they won't. I've never seen a whiny, red-faced, apoplectic Higgs boson before.

      --
      I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @10:13PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 28 2016, @10:13PM (#419973)

      The "Cut his mike!" Particle.