Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 13 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Friday October 28 2016, @02:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the positive-numbers-are-positive dept.

Tesla Reports First Quarterly Profit for Three Years

Electric car maker Tesla has reported net income of $21.9m (£17.9m) for the third quarter after 13 consecutive quarterly losses.

This compared with a loss of $230m a year earlier.

Record deliveries helped to offset rising expenses for next year's roll-out of the company's mass-market Model 3 saloon (sedan) car.

Tesla [PDF] delivered a record 24,821 cars during the quarter, more than 300 more than estimated.

Shares in the electric car maker jumped 3.76% in after-hours trading.

"The Tesla third quarter results reflect strong company-wide execution in many areas," said chief executive Elon Musk and chief financial officer Jason Wheeler in a statement [PDF].

A sign of things to come for Tesla's bottom line, or a blip before the big boys catch up?

Tesla Surprises Wall Street, Posts a Profit for Q3

Forbes is reporting that Tesla reported a profit for the third quarter yesterday. Wall Street expected Tesla to post another loss:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenkam/2016/10/27/elon-musk-surprises-wall-street-with-tesla-profits/#732fb8517cec (Javascript required.)

I, for one, am happy to see this. Not just because I have reserved a model 3, but because I am very much in favor of Tesla's mission, and hope very much that they succeed.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Friday October 28 2016, @06:17PM

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday October 28 2016, @06:17PM (#419909) Journal

    Actually, it's the opposite way around. The SEC complained that they were using too many non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principle cost exclusions in their reporting. Meaning, they weren't counting certain costs when comparing it to income to determine profit.
     
      Try a less motivated source. [bloomberg.com]

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=1, Informative=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5