Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday October 31 2016, @10:07AM   Printer-friendly
from the if-Disney-owned-the-marine-park,-they-would-have-called-it-Frozen dept.

The world's biggest marine park is to be be created in the Antarctic Ocean, covering a massive 1.55 million square kilometers, after a "momentous" agreement was finally reached by 24 countries and the EU.

The deal, sealed on Friday in Hobart, Australia, after years of negotiations and with Russia dropping its long-help opposition, will see a massive US and New Zealand-backed marine protected area established in the Ross Sea.

The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources said the Ross Sea marine park would be protected from commercial fishing for 35 years.

The marine park will cover an area roughly the size of Britain, Germany and France combined - of which 1.12 million square kilometres will be a no-fishing zone.

The sanctuary will cover more than 12 percent of the Southern Ocean, which is home to more than 10,000 species including most of the world's penguins, whales, seabirds, colossal squid and Antarctic tooth fish.

Don't kill the krill.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 31 2016, @07:26PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 31 2016, @07:26PM (#421007)

    > It's worth noting that the people unconditionally opposed to progress have no answer for human overpopulation

    No, it's worth nothing that the people unconditionally opposed to progress have no answer for human overpopulation

    Because those people are so rare that talking about them is, for all practical purposes, a strawman.

    Come back to us when you are ready to talk about reality and not the delusions in your head.

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 31 2016, @11:49PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 31 2016, @11:49PM (#421087) Journal

    No, it's worth nothing that the people unconditionally opposed to progress have no answer for human overpopulation

    The AC I replied to was of that school.

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday November 01 2016, @12:48AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday November 01 2016, @12:48AM (#421096) Journal
    To elaborate on my previous post, look at the quote again.

    Its funny in a not-funny way how so many people assume that "progress" is a worthy goal unto itself.

    That's not someone who merely thinks that progress has some drawbacks.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 01 2016, @05:07PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 01 2016, @05:07PM (#421314)

      What you are reading into that quote is what is in your head, not what was written.

      In order to take that quote as meaning unconditional opposition you have to literally believe that anything less than progress for the sake of progress is unconditional opposition to all progress.

      By now we all know you are a dumbass who can only see the world in black and white, but jesus henry christ, try to overcome your limitations already.