Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Monday October 31 2016, @06:16PM   Printer-friendly
from the explosions-killing-everybody-isn't-a-choice dept.

Researchers at MIT have put together a pictorial survey http://moralmachine.mit.edu/ -- if the self-driving car loses its brakes, should it go straight or turn? Various scenarios are presented with either occupants or pedestrians dying, and there are a variety of peds in the road from strollers to thieves, even pets.

This AC found that I quickly began to develop my own simplistic criteria and the decisions got easier the further I went in the survey.

While the survey is very much idealized, it may have just enough complexity to give some useful results?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by VLM on Monday October 31 2016, @07:11PM

    by VLM (445) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 31 2016, @07:11PM (#420988)

    And when you're putting people into the loop we're back to where we started, with human driven cars, except its NEETs from R9K earning dronebucks to buy their tendies instead of the inhabitants of the cars.

    I mean, its not like automation and outsourcing is creating vast populations of unemployables who need jobs that the economy is too small to provide, or anything.

    If you ever want one of those sleepless thoughts to keep you awake and worried in the middle of the night, note that some economic systems have done a pretty good job of balancing the employee to job ratio. Middle ages feudalism. 1950s - 1960s America. And there's been economic systems where the number of jobs has nothing to do with and often has been very small compared to the number of hungry employees. And those have all been some real paradises, like Germany before Hitler, urban poor in the French Revolution, USA before Trump... I'm just saying every economist and futurist saying that its great, just the best thing they ever heard, that half of us or three quarters or whatever are going to be unemployed due to robots or automation or WTF are I'm sure paid well for their treason today, but re-enacting the French Revolution complete with guillotines is not gonna be fun. And if its not gonna be fun I want to get it started early and get it over with, so we can start the rebuilding. So there's a substantial and growing segment of the population wishing they would just get on with it, so we can get it done with sooner.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Monday October 31 2016, @07:22PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Monday October 31 2016, @07:22PM (#421003)

    > re-enacting the French Revolution complete with guillotines

    Here's a good way to put people back to work!
    There is a lot of money to be made in the high-end guillotine market, with plush leather bench, titanium blade, 22.2 sound, oxygen-free copper blood troth, friction-free maglev rails, high-speed 8K cameras...
    The Trump version comes plated with 24k gold, but I wouldn't vouch for its reliability.

    • (Score: 2) by VLM on Monday October 31 2016, @09:58PM

      by VLM (445) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 31 2016, @09:58PM (#421071)

      The apple one needs a new power cable every GD hardware revision. No IEC, no USB, no thunderturd, no hdmi no now we need usb-c...

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Monday October 31 2016, @07:43PM

    by Scruffy Beard 2 (6030) on Monday October 31 2016, @07:43PM (#421021)

    Jobs are not the purpose of an economy.

    The purpose of an economy is to allocate our limited resources to server our needs and wants.

    Jobs are a means to an end. If jobs become obsolete, then so does our economy.

    • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 31 2016, @08:10PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 31 2016, @08:10PM (#421032)

      And why should you decide how resources are allocated? Why should any of you unimportant idiots decide anything?

      Elong Musky wants to plant his seed on Mars. He could do it today if only the rest of you greedy insignificant fools would stop allocating resources to yourselves. Stop impeding Musky!

    • (Score: 2, Insightful) by WillR on Monday October 31 2016, @08:34PM

      by WillR (2012) on Monday October 31 2016, @08:34PM (#421037)
      Aye, and one of those scarce resources is the first world lifestyle. Presently, we mostly allocate those to people who win the job game, by landing the highest paying position they can and occupying it as long as possible, as some sort of distant proxy for actual worth as a human (the correlation between the two was poor a hundred years ago, and probably inverted now, but I digress...)