Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday November 01 2016, @07:03AM   Printer-friendly
from the getting-too-hot? dept.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has sent a letter demanding George Hotz's company comma.ai provide information pertaining to the safety of their system (https://www.scribd.com/document/329218929/2016-10-27-Special-Order-Directed-to-Comma-ai).

This morning [28 Oct], Ars Technica reports that George Hotz tweeted from Shenzhen that the comma one was now cancelled (https://twitter.com/comma_ai/status/791958413345382400).

comma.ai had just received a $3.1m investment from Andreessen-Horowitz in April (http://money.cnn.com/2016/04/04/technology/george-hotz-comma-ai-andreessen-horowitz/index.html).


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Tuesday November 01 2016, @08:23AM

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday November 01 2016, @08:23AM (#421167) Journal

    I agree with your views regarding open source - but it will not happen.

    No federal department will approve a system that can be readily changed by the user which might then turn the car into a potentially lethal threat to other road users. They will want it locked down tight [1] with someone responsible for ensuring that the code meets whatever tests were agreed before the software was approved for public use.

    [1] For some arbitrary definition of 'tight'

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 01 2016, @09:59AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 01 2016, @09:59AM (#421191)

    I agree with your views regarding open source - but it will not happen.

    Then self-driving cars should not happen, and certainly no laws mandating that car drivers use them.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 01 2016, @10:27AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 01 2016, @10:27AM (#421205)

      If you don't want Panopticon, driverless cars, and digital systems, then you don't want to live in America. As much as I would like to see these things quashed so we can leave a modestly free life of liberty, neither freedom nor liberty exist in America without money, connections, or corrupt power.