SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
posted by
cmn32480
on Wednesday November 02 2016, @08:33AM
from the heading-for-a-new-dark-age dept.
from the heading-for-a-new-dark-age dept.
The New Yorker wonders:
My children know how to print their letters. And they type frighteningly well. Still, I can't escape the conviction that cursive—writing it and knowing how to read it—represents some universal value. I'm not the only one who thinks so. Every year, there are worried articles about the decline of cursive and its omission from school curricula. And there's a backlash, one that I secretly cheer for. When I read that Washington state is now considering Senate Bill 6469, "an act related to requiring that cursive writing be taught in common schools," I gave a little fist pump in the air.
Cursive and handwriting are dead. Communication of the future will be done with pure emoticons.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Our business is run on trust. We trust you will pay in advance.
(Score: 2) by fido_dogstoyevsky on Wednesday November 02 2016, @12:06PM
...Typing becomes a bit too "digital" (oh my god, so many puns), mostly because the keys never move around, unlike writing which can be quite freeform. I suspect most of the benefits can be achieved with just printed letters, but perhaps cursive does help here?
Printing would be fine from a learning point of view, cursive can be faster and less tiring.
Then it's not so much about the end knowledge gained, it's more about the journey taken and how it helps a young child develop.
Basically yes, see comment 421582 [soylentnews.org].
It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.