Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday November 02 2016, @08:33AM   Printer-friendly
from the heading-for-a-new-dark-age dept.

The New Yorker wonders:

My children know how to print their letters. And they type frighteningly well. Still, I can't escape the conviction that cursive—writing it and knowing how to read it—represents some universal value. I'm not the only one who thinks so. Every year, there are worried articles about the decline of cursive and its omission from school curricula. And there's a backlash, one that I secretly cheer for. When I read that Washington state is now considering Senate Bill 6469, "an act related to requiring that cursive writing be taught in common schools," I gave a little fist pump in the air.

Cursive and handwriting are dead. Communication of the future will be done with pure emoticons.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by tftp on Thursday November 03 2016, @05:32AM

    by tftp (806) on Thursday November 03 2016, @05:32AM (#421940) Homepage

    Do you equate art with utility rather than beauty?

    That is an interesting question. Many trades are not that far removed from art - if you ever worked a lathe, soldered or welded something. But trades are nearly universally recognized as useful. The value of beauty is highly subjective and varies wildly. Ask a child in early 1900's what he wants to study - to be a mechanic or to be a poet - and chances are that the child's choice will not surprise anyone. Arts are only for a few, and beauty is not essential for life. (Many are entirely blind to beauty.) Utility is for everyone, and in most cases you cannot live without it.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by linkdude64 on Thursday November 03 2016, @03:06PM

    by linkdude64 (5482) on Thursday November 03 2016, @03:06PM (#422063)

    Art is just art, but Design is Everything.

    There is a subtle difference, though there is obviously overlap. Art is, in my opinion, more instinctual, but true Design in any subject approaches divinity as it blends the conscious and the subconscious.