Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Hypersonic Cruise Missile Scores USD$175m DARPA Cash

posted by martyb on Wednesday November 02 2016, @03:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the that's-quick dept.

Phoenix666 writes:

Raytheon has scored nearly US$175 million to work on DARPA's ongoing research into hypersonics.

This time, it's not about a hypersonic plane: the program that got its contract announcement on the United States Federal Business Opportunities register today is for a hypersonic weapons system.

HAWC – the Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept – is a joint project with the US Air Force to "develop and demonstrate critical technologies to enable an effective and affordable air-launched hypersonic cruise missile", the DARPA project page says.

Raytheon's latest contract is for a scramjet HAWC, for which $3.4 million has already been committed.

While rocket-based systems routinely reach hypersonic speeds, a Mach 5 capable cruise missile would be faster to deploy and offer longer ranges than current military systems, DARPA reckons.

The next time you are on a long flight, just think that at Mach 5, you could take a lap around the Earth at the equator in 6.5 hours.

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Hypersonic Cruise Missile Scores USD$175m DARPA Cash | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 16 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 02 2016, @03:51PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 02 2016, @03:51PM (#421714)

    The cost of blowing up at your destination is so often not factored in as well.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 02 2016, @05:53PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 02 2016, @05:53PM (#421763)

    Who rides a ballistic missile anyway? Honestly!

    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday November 02 2016, @06:48PM

      by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday November 02 2016, @06:48PM (#421786)

      Astronauts.
      Astronauts are cool. Why don't you ride a ballistic missile to work, uncool person?

      • (Score: 1) by nitehawk214 on Wednesday November 02 2016, @06:52PM

        by nitehawk214 (1304) on Wednesday November 02 2016, @06:52PM (#421790)

        Because I don't want my office to be a crater when I arrive.

        Wait, let me think about that... Why DON'T I take a ballistic missile to work?

        --
        "Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh

        • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday November 02 2016, @07:08PM

          by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday November 02 2016, @07:08PM (#421796)

          Courtesy of new tech, you can just blowtorch the top 10 floors when you land on the roof, instead of making a crater. (most of the time)
          Just pinpoint which cube/office you want obliterated first. Crater optional depending on the construction standards and the responsiveness of the fire department.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 02 2016, @07:36PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 02 2016, @07:36PM (#421806)

            The cubicle dogs are dreaming of freedom / vengeance today....

            Must be weds...

    • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Wednesday November 02 2016, @11:40PM

      by butthurt (6141) on Wednesday November 02 2016, @11:40PM (#421882) Journal

      Cruise missiles and ballistic missiles are different. A cruise missile has wings for lift.

    • (Score: 1) by asdfgh on Thursday November 03 2016, @02:42AM

      by asdfgh (6393) on Thursday November 03 2016, @02:42AM (#421913)

      I'm pretty sure Slim Pickens would do it.