Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Wednesday November 02 2016, @03:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the that's-quick dept.

Raytheon has scored nearly US$175 million to work on DARPA's ongoing research into hypersonics.

This time, it's not about a hypersonic plane: the program that got its contract announcement on the United States Federal Business Opportunities register today is for a hypersonic weapons system.

HAWC – the Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept – is a joint project with the US Air Force to "develop and demonstrate critical technologies to enable an effective and affordable air-launched hypersonic cruise missile", the DARPA project page says.

Raytheon's latest contract is for a scramjet HAWC, for which $3.4 million has already been committed.

While rocket-based systems routinely reach hypersonic speeds, a Mach 5 capable cruise missile would be faster to deploy and offer longer ranges than current military systems, DARPA reckons.

The next time you are on a long flight, just think that at Mach 5, you could take a lap around the Earth at the equator in 6.5 hours.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 02 2016, @05:53PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 02 2016, @05:53PM (#421763)

    Who rides a ballistic missile anyway? Honestly!

  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday November 02 2016, @06:48PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday November 02 2016, @06:48PM (#421786)

    Astronauts.
    Astronauts are cool. Why don't you ride a ballistic missile to work, uncool person?

    • (Score: 1) by nitehawk214 on Wednesday November 02 2016, @06:52PM

      by nitehawk214 (1304) on Wednesday November 02 2016, @06:52PM (#421790)

      Because I don't want my office to be a crater when I arrive.

      Wait, let me think about that... Why DON'T I take a ballistic missile to work?

      --
      "Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
      • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday November 02 2016, @07:08PM

        by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday November 02 2016, @07:08PM (#421796)

        Courtesy of new tech, you can just blowtorch the top 10 floors when you land on the roof, instead of making a crater. (most of the time)
        Just pinpoint which cube/office you want obliterated first. Crater optional depending on the construction standards and the responsiveness of the fire department.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 02 2016, @07:36PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 02 2016, @07:36PM (#421806)

          The cubicle dogs are dreaming of freedom / vengeance today....

          Must be weds...

  • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Wednesday November 02 2016, @11:40PM

    by butthurt (6141) on Wednesday November 02 2016, @11:40PM (#421882) Journal

    Cruise missiles and ballistic missiles are different. A cruise missile has wings for lift.

  • (Score: 1) by asdfgh on Thursday November 03 2016, @02:42AM

    by asdfgh (6393) on Thursday November 03 2016, @02:42AM (#421913)

    I'm pretty sure Slim Pickens would do it.