Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday November 03 2016, @08:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the uplifting-story dept.

Lithium, the lightest solid element, is created during astrophysical phenomena, but its origin has been elusive. Recently, a group of researchers detected enormous quantities of beryllium-7, an unstable element that decays into lithium in 53.2 days, inside nova Sagittarii 2015 N.2, which suggests that novae are the main source of lithium in the galaxy.

Practically every chemical element has an astronomical origin. Light elements were formed between 10 seconds and 20 minutes after the Big Bang, including hydrogen (75%), helium (25%) and a very small amount of lithium and beryllium.

The remaining chemical elements were formed in stars, either through fusion of other elements inside the nucleus, which begins with the fusion of hydrogen into helium, and produces increasingly heavy elements until iron forms. Other processes such as supernovae explosions or reactions in the atmospheres of giant stars produce gold, lead and copper, among others. Those elements were in turn recycled into new stars and planets, until the present time.

Luca Izzo, researcher at the Institute of Astrophysics of Andalusia (IAA-CSIC), says, "But lithium posed a problem: We knew that 25 percent of existing lithium comes from primordial nucleosynthesis, but we were not able to trace the origins of the remaining 75 percent."

So that's why the hoverboards and Samsung Galaxy Note 7's have been exploding...


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 03 2016, @09:56PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 03 2016, @09:56PM (#422268)

    Nova != supernova
    (The opening sequence to the PBS "Science" program "NOVA" is completely wrong.)

    A nova is a phenomenon peculiar to some binary stars, where there is an ongoing exchange of material between the pair.
    It gives a dramatic effect and adds to the brilliance of the pair but is not the one-time explosive thing that happens with a supernova.

    A supernova is a star (of 2.3 solar masses or more) which, having depleted its supply of hydrogen, has reached the end of its life.
    The inward force of gravity overcomes the weakened force of the greatly-reduced outward force due to fusion; the star first collapses then rebounds with a dramatic, very energetic explosion.

    It is that energy which creates any naturally-occurring elements which are heavier than iron.

    TFA postulates that some lighter elements also come out of the event.
    Others will say that that is simply the way those are disbursed throughout the cosmos after previously being created by hydrogen fusion.

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 03 2016, @10:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 03 2016, @10:05PM (#422272)

    s/created by hydrogen fusion/created by hydrogen fusion and the gravity of the star

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by butthurt on Friday November 04 2016, @12:52AM

    by butthurt (6141) on Friday November 04 2016, @12:52AM (#422324) Journal

    The original article uses the term "nova" rather than "supernova":

    http://mnrasl.oxfordjournals.org/content/463/1/L117 [oxfordjournals.org]

    It is a study of Nova Sagittarii 2015 #2 (Nova Sagittarii 2015 No. 2) which, as I understand it, means the second nova observed in the constellation Sagittarius in the year 2015.

    Some stars fuse helium, rather than hydrogen. Some even fuse carbon, oxygen or silicon.

    http://physics.about.com/od/physicsqtot/g/StellarNucleosynthesis.htm [about.com]

  • (Score: 2) by stormwyrm on Friday November 04 2016, @03:06AM

    by stormwyrm (717) on Friday November 04 2016, @03:06AM (#422357) Journal

    TFA postulates that some lighter elements also come out of the event.

    That is not what the article says. The title is correct, I think. A core collapse supernova (type II or type 1b/c) may create a lot of heavy elements in the throes of its destruction but lighter elements like lithium cannot be made in large quantities by such a process. A massive star forced into attempting iron fusion generally winds up making elements heavier than iron when it explodes in a supernova. A Type Ia supernova results from a white dwarf that has accreted so much matter that it exceeds the Chandrasekhar limit, becoming dense enough to ignite runaway carbon fusion. The resulting explosion generally winds up producing elements heavier than carbon, and no large quantities of lithium can be made in that process. A white dwarf nova on the other hand seems like it can create a lot of lithium in the relatively milder fusion reactions involved, as its gravity draws hydrogen away from the outer envelope of its companion star.

    --
    Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.