Parliament must vote on whether the UK can start the process of leaving the EU, the High Court has ruled.
This means the government cannot trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty - beginning formal exit negotiations with the EU - on its own.
Theresa May says the referendum - and existing ministerial powers - mean MPs do not need to vote, but campaigners called this unconstitutional.
The government is appealing, with a further hearing expected next month.
- Rolling reaction to Article 50 court ruling
- Kuenssberg: Will this mean early election?
- The High Court's judgement in full
- Brexit: All you need to know
A statement is to be made to MPs on Monday but the prime minister's official spokesman said the government had "no intention of letting" the judgement "derail Article 50 or the timetable we have set out. We are determined to continue with our plan".
Plebiscites only count when plebes vote the way they're told.
(Score: 2) by choose another one on Friday November 04 2016, @11:56AM
The UK constitution is not unwritten, it is just written all over several centuries of case law. Sometimes I am surprised the US didn't do it this way because it seems that it ought to inherently make more money for lawyers, on the other hand they seem to make plenty (more) in the US anyway so what do I know.
The issue is _what_ power it places it the hands of parliament, and what is with the crown (HMG). Treaty making has always been with HMG, law making with parliament. A notification under article 50 of the Lisbon treaty would appear to be the preserve of HMG, and there are parts of other EU treaties where parliament has passed laws that explicitly bind HMG to come back to parliament before acting under the treaty - why would that be necessary if HMG didn't have the authority to act on a treaty without parliamentary approval anyway?
They key to the ruling is the assumption that article 50 is irrevocable and inevitably alters UK law (therefore requiring parliament) or not - and even the guy who wrote it says it is not, but the government chose not to argue that and therefore lost in court, possibly intentionally. Maybe the ECJ will settle that point.
(Score: 3, Informative) by TheRaven on Friday November 04 2016, @12:34PM
The UK constitution is not unwritten, it is just written all over several centuries of case law
The technical term that you'll find in a politics textbook is 'written but not codified'.
sudo mod me up